Donate SIGN UP

How News Should Be Or Piers Morgan Lies To You Less

Avatar Image
ukanonymous | 21:01 Sun 07th Feb 2021 | News
34 Answers
So I have watched this a few times now and started to appreciate it. They point out things in a factual or as close to factual as possible. Anyway when I watch this I see how the news is supposed to be. Not sugar coated, not full of conspiracies, not biased towards any group just a straight talking and where possible facts. Anyhow my question is do you think this is just all made up rubbish or are they actually giving better information than the main stream?
Gravatar

Answers

21 to 34 of 34rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by ukanonymous. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
News by conspiracy nutters for conspiracy nutters.
Question Author
Sunk very interesting. So they are not subject to regulation so they can talk freely that sounds unbiased to me. They are kind if regulated now anyway because of social media. Remember the mainstream media told us masks were not important.. then they were. These people don't make false claims they lay down the facts. However some people think the world economic Forum is a conspiracy so they will most likely think these things are rubbish too. The only way this company may have lied is by making up listener write ins. All the rest is fact you can check it. But what do I know hehe
"But what do I know hehe"

I really really want to answer that but don't want to get suspended.
“they can talk freely that sounds unbiased to me”

To use your own expression: “Ooopsies!”
A major flaw in your reasoning there.
//Remember the mainstream media told us masks were not important.. then they were.//
Am going to stop responding as your clearly not getting it. The mainstream media didnt tell us masks were not important- they just reported what the science was saying at the time.

//These people don't make false claims they lay down the facts.//
Rubbish. Its a 'news' site with an agenda. Maybe funded by nutters, by sponsors or by foreign goverments that like to unsettle thos ein the demacratic parts of the world
// All the rest is fact you can check it. But what do I know hehe //

I posted a link to the fact check earlier, which you've conveniently ignored.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/uk-column/

To save you the arduous task of clicking it, here's [part of] their conclusion:

"Analysis / Bias

In review, UK Column uses loaded language both in their headlines and articles such as: ”Cameron and Obama’s Hired Thugs Now Butchering Their Way Through Syria.” This article, like many on the website, does not link to a single source. However, they sometimes utilize credible sources such as the NY Times, gov.uk and questionable sources such as the Daily Mail and conspiracy sites such as 21st Century Wire: “White Helmets.” When covering USA politics the UK Column favors Donald Trump and his policies. They also promote conspiracy theories such as the New World Order, False Flag Operations, and World War 3. While the UK Column does produce credible, well-sourced news, they also promote conspiracy theories.

During the Coronavirus pandemic of 2020, they frequently published misinformation such as Lockdown Deaths, Not Covid Deaths. In this article, they state “COVID-19 has been circulating for at least a year and yet there was no notable increase in unseasonable mortality anywhere until Lockdown regimes were imposed between late February and late March 2020.” This statement is false as lockdowns have saved numerous lives. They have also promoted anti-mask propaganda with this statement “Masks are utterly useless. There is no evidence base for their effectiveness, whatsoever. Paper masks and fabric masks are simply virtue signalling. They’re not even worn effectively most of the time.” This also is not true. In general, the UK Column is not a credible source of information that routinely publishes right-wing conspiracy theories."

also, as far as i recall, the lockdown did not happen till towards the end of march
// So they are not subject to regulation so they can talk freely that sounds unbiased to me. //

what ? there is no control on what you say and so it is likely to be - - - true? - hey mate can you lend me a fiver, I am a millionaire but a little short at the miment....

troll or jeerk
sozza missed out the he he
Question Author
Chinajan the website you posted do not show any numbers or statistics and use phrases like 'saved numerous lives' .. where as UK column news actually give real government values. Anyone can make a website criticising things and since they do not give any information one can research then its just their opinion. For me opinions don't mean much. Science and mathematics is what I lool for :)
You appear to be wilfully misunderstanding the function of fact checkers.

I give up. It's not for me to police this place and you've already been warned to stop posting misinformation.
// Anyone can make a website criticising things and since they do not give any information one can research then its just their opinion. //

sounds a bit like UK on AB

liking stats and data - yup we all do -

// /These people don't make false claims they lay down the facts.// oh dear I think that is a nother whoopsie - he he!
That’s enough internet for today I think
Question Author
China jan are you telling me fact checkers are always right? I am asking about the credibility of this news agency its you that started delving Into the specifics I was just replying to you without implying anything.

21 to 34 of 34rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Do you know the answer?

How News Should Be Or Piers Morgan Lies To You Less

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.