Ok Let's Do The Usual Dance.......

[ToraToraTora]

https://news.sky.com/story/at-least-two-dead-and-several-injured-after-car-drives-into-pedestrians-in-southwest-germany-12148078
I say TROP did it........

[Sunk]

Sunk: // I hate Islamic terrorism as much as everyone else //

TTT: //...not from what I've seen Sunk //

You really are a nasty vile man.
It is people like you that are killing this site.

[ToraToraTora]

sunk, you are so contorted with rage, take a chill pill me old china, ok I was wrong, I thought you'd be happy. Can't win with you lefty types can we.

[jno]

the wrath of the ROB

they don't seem very wrathful. Mostly they seem to be laughing.

[Spicerack]

Even when we are winning, they cheat.

[royfromaus]

5 dead including a 9-month-old baby and ...Mostly they seem to be laughing.


Strewth.

[Peter Pedant]

this thread does seem a monument to islamophobia
so British -
as usual no lessons learnt
I wd write the same if it occurred today etc etc

what is it like on a high horse Roy? - is " a mad drunk German kills people" news ?

[Peter Pedant]

yeah and I take back egyptologist
retired - or egyptologist-manque ( yeah that is mong-kay and not mong-head, you long word haters )

as I resiled from the weeks monument to islamophobia ( this thread I mean !) - I had in my mail box

Shishak not sheshonk shock !

Champollion (*) needed monnay and identified the bubasist gate (*) inscriptions at Karnak (*) with the battles under Sheshonq = biblical shishak. Champollion even identified one bound prisoner as a Hebrew prisoner. And now they think it is someone else.
Early attribution - one of the earlies now seen to be overblown

PP takes his laurel crown orf

(*) oh god never mind

[Untitled]

"Untitled, we don’t acknowledge the source - which is why, in my opinion, we can’t combat it. As I said best you ask someone else."

This is disingenuous. Tell me what you would like to see happen in order to combat islam. Tell me the thing that you think is impossible to do.

But we've had this conversation before, and you wouldn't say last time either. You just wanted to say over and over again that islam was the problem and let other people fill in the blank for you with some very nasty answers indeed.

[Untitled]

And it turned out that islam had nothing whatsoever to do with this tragedy, despite the eagerness of some people to attribute it. How sick.

[chelle7272]

This thread is frankly unbelievable. 5 people, including a nine week old baby are dead. How typical it is of AB that the majority of posts are sniping and bickering with with each other. You should be ashamed of yourselves.

[naomi24]

Untitled. Unless you’re one of the many who appear to deem Islam beyond criticism, I’m at a loss to think what I’ve said that you consider nasty - but I do get the impression that you’re gunning for me. Anyway that aside, you haven’t been paying enough attention to my posts because I have outlined elsewhere that given the right circumstances, ie acknowledging that the problem emanates from Islamic ideology, what I would like to see happen. Just to refresh your memory if you did happen to be paying attention, I would lock up every single person who has any connection whatsoever to terrorism - and I would lock them up for life without the courtesy of providing halal food or access to Imams, the internet, or to Islamic literature. That, of course, in current circumstances, isn’t going to happen, which is why I suggested you asked someone else, but I trust that answers your latest question.

You might find this recent article by muslim, Sajid Javid, interesting. He likens the ideology of Islamic extremism to a virus and says Woke activists are thwarting attempts to wipe it out. On the other hand it might just be too close for comfort for you.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/13343727/woke-activists-thwarting-attempts-wipe-out-virus-of-islamism/

[Untitled]

Thank you naomi. What youve written does make sense. But you must be aware there are a lot of people with dark agendas whose goal on topics like this is to try and provoke hatred and distrust of muslims as a whole so when you said you consider the problem "islam" rather than "people connected with terrorism" (as you rightly said above) then it can be easy to mistake you for someone like that. It's important that we are careful with our words with topics like that.

[naomi24]

//it can be easy to mistake you for someone like that.//

It can - if you're looking for it and ignoring the rest.

[Untitled]

I make no apology for being vigilant. I'm grateful that you have expressed your ideas more clearly now.

[Atheist]

Naomi 11:54
" I would lock up every single person who has any connection whatsoever to terrorism - and I would lock them up for life without the courtesy of providing halal food or access to Imams, the internet, or to Islamic literature."
So, wives, children... all to be imprisoned for life. Not humane, not reeasonable, no chance of helping the world's situation. Are you sure you really mean what you said?

[Mozz71]

Uh oh. I see a breach of THAT rule.

[pixie374]

//It can - if you're looking for it and ignoring the rest.//

It can and will, while you continue to use the word "muslim" when you really mean "terrorist".

[Zacs-Master]

Or say you'd deliberately not said who they were, but had.

[naomi24]

//So, wives, children... all to be imprisoned for life.//

Indeed you do see a breach of THAT rule, Mozz. A clear example of reading what isn’t there. I rest my case.

[Zacs-Master]

'A clear example of reading what isn’t there'

Better to do that than actually write you hadn't said something when you had. Eh?