Donate SIGN UP

Answers

41 to 60 of 60rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by dannyk13. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Hope he does, he deserves it, that'll be a slap in the face for his critics.
If you look, Roy...folk who voted joyfully for Trump are now wondering why on earth they did. I just hope he loses. More than that I just wish there was somebody better up against him.
//They are threatening to carry on smashing up the US if Trump wins the forthcoming election.//

Will it be any better if he loses though Roy? He's certainly never shied away from inciting violence from his supporters in the past?



Your turn.
It isn't a contest mate.
//folk who voted joyfully for Trump are now wondering why on earth they did. I just hope he loses. //

Well, if they are genuinely wondering why they voted for him, you'll get your wish. The outcome remains to be seen.
Obama walked the walk but didn’t talk the talk.

Trump delivers on multiple peace keeping fronts. This is just the latest that has negligible and I mean negligible coverage on MSM unless it is to disparage or down play the treaty. Just like they did with NK.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/president-donald-j-trump-secured-historic-deal-israel-united-arab-emirates-advance-peace-prosperity-region/

But the MSM blackout on ‘good news about Trump‘ seems to be working. If you research outside the MSM bubble, that by the way fact checks with itself rather than the source, you would actually see why Trump is popular outside that very bubble.

Anonymous sources claim.... all sorts of *** and MSM verified it by checking with other MSM outlets. But 25 named people at the time, in the room or privy to immediate first hand knowledge or work with him on a daily basis debunks it. So what happens. MSM pivot to something new.

And the MSM brainwashed fall for it every time. They fall for the twisting of facts because it fits the narrative that they have been fed.

Mozz, Will it be any better if he loses though Roy? He's certainly never shied away from inciting violence from his supporters in the past?

Do you have a link please. And one that is in context that hasn’t been clipped by the MSM?
It was good to formalise the relationship between Israel and the UAE. But they were hardly sworn enemies to start with.
I wonder if the Nobel committee takes other issues into consideration when judging nominees. For example, does one success outweigh one or more failures?
//Do you have a link please. And one that is in context that hasn’t been clipped by the MSM?//

So what you're saying is that any clip or transcript I provide will immediately have you claiming that it is edited by the main stream media to make him look bad? Is it worth my providing anything in that case?

Let's just start with the old rallies, where he offered to pay the legal fees of anyone who beat up liberals in the crowd as the original, and say that he has used threatening speech constantly since then throughout his presidency.
I remember when Henry Kissinger, Secretary of State under Nixon and Ford, was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, the great American satirist and lyricist Tom Lehrer immediately announced his retirement on the grounds that the award had made satire redundant.
Trump probably made Spitting Image redundant
//he offered to pay the legal fees of anyone who beat up liberals in the crowd//

?
Thanks Mozz. He certainly says some odd things but I wonder why the media didn’t have a field day with that? He can't breathe without being wrong. Odd they missed that one.
Naomi, perhaps it was from he pre-election rallies in 2016, so they hoped he would mature in office? It was quite well reported at the time (it must've been for me to remember it), but there's been a lot of goings on since then!
I saw no reports of it, Mozz, and the criticism of him didn't just begin after he was elected. It was from day one of his campaign.
I hope he gets the NPP. He deserves it.
Not only as OP link but briefly :
a: withdrew Obamas funding to Iran.
b.Supported Jerusalem for Israel.
c. Cancelled all in/out China flights in Jan (I was then in USA) saving millions from covid.
d. Cancelled funds to WHO & Wuhan.
e. for ignoring Thurnberg - that alone warrants TPP.
Mozz, context is everything if you are going to make a claim.

More often than not, well pretty much all the time whatever Trump says is taken out of context. So if you can’t put what you are saying in context and just pull a phrase out then basically you are part of the problem of misinformation.

Gness @ 22.49 No. Trump is dividing his country.

What The Funicular? Have you not been watching the news where the ANTIFA, BLM and anarchists have been rioting with the full backing of the Democrats? Honestly where are you getting your news from? BBC who gets it from CNN who fact check with their own backsides?

41 to 60 of 60rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3

Do you know the answer?

Nobel Peace Prize

Answer Question >>