In short, they have had and will see far far fewer problems than here.
Sweden has coped with the outbreak with a lot less hysteria than we have. They have had very little in the way of “lockdown”. Most schools are open; bars, restaurants and shops have continued trading; only senior schools/universities have been closed and gatherings of more than 50 are prohibited. Here’s a report from another forum I use from somebody in Stockholm:
"I've been in Stockholm for basically the entire outbreak (I was in the UK at the start of March when it had barely begun) and what is most striking is how calm everything has been.
Today, if you didn't read the news at all, you wouldn't know anything unusual was happening - apart from screens protecting staff just in the grocery stores, and notices to keep distance and very few people wearing masks - maybe you'd assume there was a bad 'flu outbreak.
What is noticeable as well is that services have continued as normal, so evidently there aren't a lot of people at home sick.
Obviously because the restrictions have been measured, there's no agonising over what to open, as most things weren't shut anyway. All that's left is the "biggies" - international travel (Sweden hasn't shut its border but advises against travelling abroad and right now it's simply difficult to do anyway) and mass gatherings of people at sports matches, events, etc.
While the deaths are of course sad, they are absolutely nowhere near some of the wilder predictions: that it would be worse than the Spanish Flu, etc. Because the media has focused so much on death figures, I think people lack perspective of what the death numbers mean when taken in context - for example, around 90,000 people die in Sweden every year anyway (I don't know what the figure is for the UK?).
With the overwhelming majority of healthy people getting through this with no, mild, or at worst quite rough symptoms at home, one can only conclude that pre-existing human resistance to this is much much better than was predicted by many."