Basic respect is unconditional. As to the irrationality, that's subjective and then some. It isn't enough just to say so. *Show* me where I'm being irrational. All you do is state it, again and again, as if that is ever enough.
I don't recognise anything in the rest of your post. I don't have the agenda you clearly think I do; I don't recognise even remotely the idea that I'm flouting any basic principles. Again, as in this discussion, the simple point I'm making is that there is no right to speak at a given venue, and therefore no right has been taken away from anybody in this case. I don't see anything you've said that refutes that yet, and I don't see how anything can.
Nor do I see the relevance of LGBT education in schools. As long as it's part of normal sex education, and as long as it's presented in a neutral way, then what issue is there? We risk returning to the days of Section 28 if you are meaning to imply that LGBT education is necessarily part of some "gay agenda", or whatever, rather than a call for understanding and acceptance.