Donate SIGN UP

Why Are The Police Paying Out For Shooting Drug Dealing Scum?

Avatar Image
ToraToraTora | 14:18 Thu 10th Oct 2019 | News
58 Answers
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-49997178
They should bill them for the damage they caused. hell in a hand cart!
Gravatar

Answers

41 to 58 of 58rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3

Avatar Image
" Simply because someone deals drugs does not mean they are a low life and deserve to get shot." If they are not "a low life", what exactly are they?
14:52 Thu 10th Oct 2019
///I don't remember seeing the old reports.. but was it ever published that Mark Druggan was officially a drug dealer?///

Best acquaint/educate yourself with facts before spouting inane drivel. You don't appear to realise what you are defending here. (except drug dealing of course)
Defending the right not to get shot? Oh what a horrid person i am
spath, when people choose to commit crime (and it is a choice) they take their chances.
spathiphyllum, an inquest jury concluded he had been lawfully killed. How can you say, when you weren't there and haven't heard all the evidence refer to it as an execution? Are you basing this statement on evidence that nobody else has seen or is it just your hatred for the police that makes you say it?
It's only taxpayers money, and there is loads of that.
The police who stopped him also had the right not to get shot and they ensured they didn't. That's what I mean by winning.Knowing he was armed and a propensity to use them they still did their job knowing they would have to justify their actions to a coroner whilst being on suspension from duty. If the coroner and jury judged it unlawful then he would of been up in front of the Old Bailey, You are too young to know about PC Patrick Hodgson.
The officer managed to come home to wife and family safely and exonerated. Duggan didn't and didn't deserve to either. If the police hadn't shot him a rival gang would of. These people you support and have sympathy for? You are winding us up again.
16:12 He definitely hates the police, that's for sure.
I disagree with you on this one, spath. They believed, fairly, he was carrying a gun and protected themselves.
I don't hate the police at all. I have a grudge against the met. That's fair enough and it's justified.
Good TV prog tonight about the Met, thank goodness for them.
//I have a grudge against the met. That's fair enough and it's justified.//

Are we allowed to know how so it's justified?
This answer may get removed..

But AFAIK they allow a paedophile ring in parliament. Main issue no.1
This lays blame due to a series of police failings.

Not to mention the numerous others failings they have.

I've also had a personal experience with the metropolitan which i won't go into.

Their statistics are also not the best. Not the worst, granted.. certainly not the best.
The met and the HOP tie in nicely don't they. Wriggling with each others worms.
It’s appalling that this wretched family got money for the deserved end of their drug dealing, armed thug of a son. There has been far too much leftist tolerance for violent criminals. It’s about time the pendulum swung the other way and punishments fitted the crime.
X
Spath "Simply because someone deals drugs does not mean they are a low life..."

You're an idiot.
SO19 officer in lawful possesion of a handgun. The scrote wasn't. Result.

41 to 58 of 58rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3

Do you know the answer?

Why Are The Police Paying Out For Shooting Drug Dealing Scum?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.