Donate SIGN UP

Sally Challen

Avatar Image
Tilly2 | 17:49 Sun 07th Apr 2019 | News
212 Answers
You may remember me posting this link wishing this woman well.

https://www.theanswerbank.co.uk/News/Question1648041.html

She has had the conviction for murder quashed and is now back home.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-surrey-47845450

She will now face a new trial and again, I hope that things turn out positively for her.
Gravatar

Answers

201 to 212 of 212rss feed

First Previous 8 9 10 11

Avatar Image
I have had the benefit of reading the judgements in the original appeal against sentence and the latest one against conviction. I am in two minds about this. They had separated and she had moved out; however, they had reconciled and they had spent the afternoon together at the former matrimonial home. That afternoon, she became suspicious that he was...
11:06 Mon 08th Apr 2019
Barmaid

/// I do not recall anyone asking "Why didnt he just leave"? ///

Interesting that, neither did he resort to murdering her.
Prudie

/// and the hammer in the bag does suggest some premeditation ///

No she could have taken it to put under her sink along side her bleach and washing up liquid.
//Interesting that, neither did he resort to murdering her.//

Well as matters stand at present, Sally Challen did not resort to murder either.
Torn on this one. On the one hand I feel sorry that she had such a miserable married life but on the otherhand they were separated.He was free to have other women in his life. After suffering mental abuse for years you would have thought she would be glad to be free. To hit someone once with a hammer takes guts but to smash a person's head to pulp with 20 blows is cold blooded murder!
I would actually suggest the level of ferocity actually meant it wasn't premeditated and that she simply and uncontrollably lost the plot for a few moments.
Rockrose/Islay at 9.59am today.

"At the end of the day the barrack room lawyers can scream 'she's a murderer end of' as much as they want - the murder conviction has been overturned and she is awaiting a new trial."

Islay/Rockrose at 1.16pm 28/03/2017 after Sargeant Blackman’s murder conviction has been quashed.

"He killed a man in cold blood - murder if you like..."

Your opinion in this case is inconsistent with your opinion in Blackman's case.
lol deskdiary your are scraping my dear.

That 'man' admitted on camera that he had done wrong and I stand by my opinion
Each case is different.....jeez
Deskdiary, AB is like that. Opinions are often inconsistent – usually because, dependent upon the subject, they are liable to become surprisingly malleable.
^^^quite.

Rockrose - your opinion back then was factually incorrect: Blackman was no longer a murderer. So to state those on this thread calling this person a murderer are wrong is hypocritical. Surely you can see that can't you?

You can't have it both ways even if you believe you can.
If you say so deskdiary if you say so!
Question Author
Thank you for your penultimate post, Barmaid. As you say 'I imagine the difference with this is that this was emotional abuse (this is the controlling and coercive behaviour). To what extent, remains to be seen.'

I shall be looking out for the outcome of her next trial.

201 to 212 of 212rss feed

First Previous 8 9 10 11

Do you know the answer?

Sally Challen

Answer Question >>

Related Questions