Donate SIGN UP

Corbyn Ally Spend Spend Spend

Avatar Image
fender62 | 18:12 Sat 22nd Sep 2018 | News
30 Answers
strange folk, so much i'm lost for words...just a thought..how many labour councils are doing well
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6196267/Jeremy-Corbyn-says-Labour-party-women.html
Gravatar

Answers

21 to 30 of 30rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by fender62. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Checked, he said, "in all probability", so is simply expressing an opinion not making a promise.
and i'm pretty sure that "in all probability" him and his bunch of muppets will never get into power
"No. He said the next Labour government would be majority women"

Gawd
Chatterbank moved to the cabinet. A daunting future for the country. :-)
//"No. He said the next Labour government would be majority women"
Does that include this lady?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6197263/Corbyn-critic-MP-armed-guard-receiving-death-threats-criticising-Labour-leader.html
when's degsy coming back?
^ hes not coming back, hes making far tooo much dosh, all in line with his socialist principles
"We should get local democracy, not control by Westminster, but by the people who are actually using the schools, hospitals, community buildings etc, where you live."

All jolly fine in Utopia. In the real world all that happens is you get a load of interfering busybodies who, instead of doing something useful, simply make nuisances of themselves and cods everything up into the bargain. Much better to have just the one lot of those in Westminster. Local services could then be run by professionals who know the business without suffering interference from people who couldn't run a whelk stall.
Do you seriously contend, NJ, that the current Cabinet could run a whelk stall?
"Do you seriously contend, NJ, that the current Cabinet could run a whelk stall?"

No I don't (any more than I had any trust in any other cabinet in recent years). My point is that since no politicians (national or local) are so endowed, it would be better to dispense with as many of them as possible.
NJ, "No politicians (national or local) are so endowed...ie to run a whelk stall...it would be better to dispense with as many of them as possible."
If so, why bother just keeping those at Westminster? We might as well go for a full autocracy and who would you have lead that...Nigel Farage?

21 to 30 of 30rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Do you know the answer?

Corbyn Ally Spend Spend Spend

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.