Donate SIGN UP

Answers

1 to 17 of 17rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Nowhere near qualified to say whether he should have got more than a 12 Month suspended sentence,3 year ban and 180 hours unpaid work.

It is a miracle he didn't kill anyone, an area I know well which is always busy.
//The cost of the damage was estimated at up £2,000 pounds// Well that doesnt really stack up with the story does it?

I'm not sure jail would serve any purpose apart from potentially make him unemployable and dependant on the State.

For these cases I would prefer to see mandatroy courses (jail if you dont attend and paid for by the individual) to rehabilitate. And of course a ban.

Jail should be for the repeat offenders and those that do it again whilst banned if only to remove the risk to the public.
I agree with youngmafbog. Jailing drink drivers, who haven't killed anyone, is a costly way. Make them by law attend rehabilitation.
Like Mamy, I am also not qualified to say if a jail sentence should have been given.

Perhaps New Judge will be along soon, to give us the legal view on this.
I presume the legal view was what happened in Court.
A suspended jail term is probably right considering no one was hurt.

I suppose drinking and driving is one way to integrate.
The sentence complies with the guidelines, so yes, he should have been spared jail

https://www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/offences/item/excess-alcohol-driveattempt-to-drive-revised-2017/
As he has a suspended sentence the sentence will be activated and he goes straight to jail if he breaks any of the terms of his suspension or is arrested, even for an unrelated offence. So he could end up in jail anyway.
“The sentence complies with the guidelines, so yes, he should have been spared jail”

https://www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/offences/item/excess-alcohol-driveattempt-to-drive-revised-2017/

The sentence does not comply with the guidelines for driving with excess alcohol. In fact it does not even comply with the law for that offence as the maximum is six months’ custody. Mr Patel received his 12 months suspended sentence for Dangerous Driving (for which the maximum is two years). Any sentence of two years or less can be suspended and that option is often used for a first time offender. He will also have to complete his unpaid work requirement. If he fails to do so, or commits any other offences within the suspension period it is almost certain that the suspended sentence will be enacted.

At the end of his disqualification period Mr Patel will have to apply for a new provisional licence and take an extended re-test (this is mandatory for those convicted of dangerous driving). Before the new licence is granted he will be contacted by the DVLA who may want him medically assessed as fit to drive. This is because he was convicted of driving with excess alcohol where the reading was more than 2.5 times the legal limit and so is considered a “high risk offender”.
Thanks as usual NJ !
The damage was £22000, mentioned later in the article.
Cost of the damage - £2,000

His Mercedes was worth - £22,000
I am not sure there is any evidence that he is an alcoholic.

He is a drunk driver, but that is not the same thing.
Question Author
andy-hughes

/// An earlier hearing was told Patel had started drinking socially at college and the fact he had an alcohol problem 'brought shame' on his family who have shop in the area of the crash. ///

/// But in mitigation Patel's lawyer Russell Davies said his client had since sought help for his drinking problem, by attending AA meetings and a local drug and alcohol
group. ///

Seems he is an alcoholic, why else would he attend Alcoholic Anonymous?

He has also admitted that he has a drink problem.
Thank you AOG - I stand corrected - and I must read links from beginning to end!
Question Author
andy-hughes

Always a wise thing to do.

Yes, always a good idea

///'The damage to the car was £22,000 and it was effectively written off.///

1 to 17 of 17rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Yet Another, Should This Alcoholic Have Been Spared Jail?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.