Crosswords1 min ago
Court Of Protection: Pensioner Jailed, Cat Has Anonymity - Utter Madness
// A grandmother of 71 has been jailed for refusing to move an elderly man from a care home where she believes he is happy.
Teresa Kirk was given six months in prison by a judge at the secretive Court of Protection, it emerged yesterday.
Mr Justice Newton ruled she had disobeyed orders to move the 80-year-old from his native Portugal to a care home in Britain chosen by social workers.
The Daily Mail is unable to name the elderly man or to describe his relationship to Mrs Kirk. Even the name of his cat cannot be published for legal reasons.
http://
To add insult to injury, Mrs Kirk had power of attorney over the mans finacial affairs and was attempting to sell his house to pay for his care in Portugal. The Court has seized the mans house and handed his financial affairs to the Court Solictor who is now busily spending this man' money on expensive court fees.
Teresa Kirk was given six months in prison by a judge at the secretive Court of Protection, it emerged yesterday.
Mr Justice Newton ruled she had disobeyed orders to move the 80-year-old from his native Portugal to a care home in Britain chosen by social workers.
The Daily Mail is unable to name the elderly man or to describe his relationship to Mrs Kirk. Even the name of his cat cannot be published for legal reasons.
http://
To add insult to injury, Mrs Kirk had power of attorney over the mans finacial affairs and was attempting to sell his house to pay for his care in Portugal. The Court has seized the mans house and handed his financial affairs to the Court Solictor who is now busily spending this man' money on expensive court fees.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Gromit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
// After social workers said he should live in a care home, she travelled with him to Portugal instead. //
Did what the Social Services said/advised have any legal clout behind it? Was she entitled to ignore them? The Court order pertains to her not giving permission to repatriate him to the UK, not going there in the first place.
Did what the Social Services said/advised have any legal clout behind it? Was she entitled to ignore them? The Court order pertains to her not giving permission to repatriate him to the UK, not going there in the first place.
Latest Posts
Crosswords1 min ago
Quartz Watch Movement Replacement
ChatterBank10 mins ago
Funny How Our Country If Full Of People...
News10 mins ago
This Is What It's Costing You Under A...
News16 mins ago
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.