Donate SIGN UP

Nadal or Federer

Avatar Image
joggerjayne | 09:50 Tue 07th Jul 2009 | Sport
15 Answers
Greatest player of the current era?

Food for thought ...

(1) Federer has only lost 5 major Finals ...
All to Nadal.

(2) They have played each other 20 times.
Nadal leads 13-7.

(3) They have played in 7 Grand Slam Finals.
Nadal leads 5-2.

(4) They have played in 16 Finals altogether.
Nadal leads 11-5.

(5) Nadal is almost 5 years younger than Federer.

So I'm thinking ... Nadal must be the better player.


Gravatar

Answers

1 to 15 of 15rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by joggerjayne. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
JJ....good morning....I wonder what salla is up to? LOL.

Define "era".....last decade?......then Federer.
Question Author
Hmm ... "Era" is a bit loose, isn't it.

How about ... the past year ...

... when Federer has only been able to win anything whatsoever if Nadal has been absent with injury, or if another player has stopped Nadal getting to the Final?
Question Author
How about Federer's last 3 Slam titles ...

... where he has not had to face Nadal in any of them.
Question Author
Salla is bound to be up to something mischievous !!

=0)
"One swallow doesn't make summer"

Last year....Nadal
Question Author
That's a fair point, sqad.

But, I wonder ...

If one swallow doesn't make a summer ... and given that Nadal has consistently beaten Federer on all surfaces ... !!

You see, although Federer has won a record number of Slams, he won a lot of them before Nadal was around.

So Nadal is already dominant over Federer, and will still be around when Federer retires.
Until Nadal wins 16 slams..........the greatest is Federer....
JJ......a lot of assumptions there my darling.

Ask the same question in 5yrs time.
How many does it take then?!!

Your stats do seem to sway in Nadal's favour JJ but I still prefer Feds =0)
Even though he looks a lot older than 27....

I used to love Sampras!
I would like to see Roddick's name on the Wimbledon wall of fame also, at least once.
This is a weird discussion really.....JJ is saying that if Nadal had been around earlier Federer would not have won all his slams.........er if Federer had been around earlier Sampras would not have won all his......if Sampras had been around earlier McEnroe and Becker would have been stuffed..........
Question Author
Well, sqad ... I'm trying to get a bit of a debate going.

Waiting 5 years would be a bit of a bore, LOL
''I would like to see Roddick's name on the Wimbledon wall of fame''

More chance of seeing Anita Roddick on there...
I think Federer is a better player than Sampras was - Sampras was a baseline slugger with a good serve - Nadal is similar -Federer has more qualities than Sampras and Nadal

1 to 15 of 15rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Nadal or Federer

Answer Question >>