Donate SIGN UP

The Turner Prize

Avatar Image
Khandro | 12:00 Thu 02nd Dec 2021 | Religion & Spirituality
83 Answers
Did anyone watch this, 'let's pretend it's art' annual event? Apart from the risible quality of the competitors, the staging of it in an English Cathedral (Coventry) left me filled with incredulity.

Against the backdrop of the large Graham Southerland alter-painting of Christ in Majesty, an assorted group of rowdy weirdos, lounged around at tables in the body of the church, drinking and sporting their egos & sexual proclivities.

How could an bishop ever allow such a thing to happen? I can find no mention of this grotesque spectacle in any of today's media and wonder if this is through timidity or embarrassment.
Gravatar

Answers

61 to 80 of 83rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Khandro. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Could you have inherited it - or could a visitor have left it behind?
Khandro - // These people are complete mediocrities, being pushed & encouraged by even greater mediocrities & I wouldn't like anyone to think that this is in any way representative of all that is happening in the world of modern art. //

You appear to be shifting the emphasis of your position from your OP.

There you were in high dudgeon about 'these people' behaving like the money changers, 'sporting their egos & sexual proclivities' as you rather primly expressed it.

Your emphasis there was clearly on inappropriate behaviour in a church, and the consent of the bishop, which clearly agitated your religious reverence, although you attempted to dodge being outed on that front, as you often do.

Now you are suggesting that it is the lack of fitness for any sort of recognition in the art world that has got you wound up - which is not what you said at first at all.
I guess I must have inherited it somehow, naomi, but I don't how. It's in excellent condition with no foxing or torn pages. There are many sad photos of people picking through the rubble; carrying pails of water through the streets; cars and ambulances resting on top of buildings, etc.
Interestingly Sanmac that ties in with another running thread re Pub names (I think) - my Town's Coat of Arms also bears the Coventry (Mercia) Elephant and Castle.
burlyshirly// Sorry APG, if I had a choice between your acerbic posts on MOST threads //

what a load of childish rubbish . If my posts work you up that much don't read them. I, however ,will carry on posting when and how I wish, but thanks for the heads up it winds you up -duly noted. ;o)
ML, I guess we could be accused of de-railing the thread...However, in a pleasant manner:)
Sanmac, that sounds so interesting. Has no one got an idea where it came from?
Have you asked around friends and family?
//Now you are suggesting that it is the lack of fitness for any sort of recognition in the art world //

The OP did say:
Apart from the risible quality of the competitors
"Apart from"...
Question Author
naomi//If the art were more to your taste would you feel as disgruntled at it being exhibited in a church?//

It's not about my taste & it's not even about the quality of the work, it is about the whole presentation being in a cathedral as I tried to describe it in the OP, which I don't think anybody actually watched last night.
Turner must be turning in his grave!
"Did anyone like the winning entry?"
My husband like that woman's dress and the contents that werent so nearly contained therein!
So would I be right in thinking that you would object to any art exhibition in the church?
Question Author
n. //So would I be right in thinking that you would object to any art exhibition in the church?//

No you wouldn't be right; some of the greatest artworks in the world are in churches & there's no reason to prevent an art exhibition taking place in one.
Khandro - // No you wouldn't be right; some of the greatest artworks in the world are in churches & there's no reason to prevent an art exhibition taking place in one. //

Them my point bears repeating, even though you are studiously ignoring it as usual -

Your objection is not to the exhbition itself, but the behaviour of the exhibutors, which appear to fall below the standards you appear to expect from people conducting themslves in a religious setting.

Specifically, their twn exhibitions of 'ego' and 'sexual proclivities' which have aroused your ire, as pointed out in your OP.
Jethro Tull are in there tomorrow night by the way, I hope the OP likes Progressive Rock or we may be in for some more pearl clutching.
Pearl clutching -love it!
Returning to the OP; I have always hated Sutherland's depiction of Christ looking like a giant wasp. I'm surprised he got past the patrons without somebody having a go.
// Against the backdrop of the large Graham Southerland alter-painting of Christ in Majesty,//

.oh god these atheists
Christ in Glory in the Tetramorph is a large tapestry by Graham Sutherland, installed at the north end of the new Coventry Cathedral in Coventry, England, .

and you should alter it to 'altar' - chrissakes
The Anglican church is latitudinarian

Gawd the usual screamers, that scream out loud when they see a long word, will give vent to their er screams.

that means boys and girls it takes all sorts - - like Abers or princess Di ( famous RC reject - Cardinal Hume said he ( it - Rome silly!) wasnt ready

and Justin Welby DD was a canon - clappy happy ( a division of the church ) so it is unlikely
pearls - to be clutched
is an unlikely scenario

sozza

61 to 80 of 83rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

The Turner Prize

Answer Question >>