English Actress 8 & 4 Ahntmbnasaod
Crosswords0 min ago
You vote for a policy (Brexit) that will result in a large number of critically needed staff working within the NHS, leaving the country – as a direct result of the lack of available hospital care, thousands die (at a rate of 1,500 a year).
Explain to me why (as a Brexit voter), the thousands of avoidable deaths have nothing to do with you.
No best answer has yet been selected by Hymie. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.My research shows that the UK has circa 2.8 medical doctors per 1,000 of the population, compared with France’s 3.4 and Italy’s 4.1.
In relation to hospital beds, the UK has circa 2.5 per 1,000 of the population, whereas France has 5.9 and Italy 3.1 (in relation to hospital bed provision, only one country within the OECD/EU has a lower proportion than the UK).
So the public health services in France and Italy is better than the UK – but this has nothing to do with Brexit.
people who voted for brexit do bear responsibility for its consequences (good and bad)... clearly they have made the decision that on balance it is preferable. i suppose many of the people who voted for it did not seriously believe it would have consequences for them which were on balance negative. they are probably right too--it is young people who will feel those the most.
"So the public health services in France and Italy is better than the UK – but this has nothing to do with Brexit."
No it hasn't because if you look back to pre-2020 the comparative figures you mention were much the same. Those measures have been deteriorating in the UK for decades and that deterioration has nothing to do with Brexit.
Much of the reason is that the NHS model is no longer fit for purpose (if it ever was). No other democratic country in the world has copied it and is ever likely to. If it was proposed (from scratch) in the UK today that proposal would get short shrift from across the political spectrum.
Thousands upon thousands of people die every year as a result of deficiencies in the NHS. They die whilst waiting for ambulances; they die whilst waiting to be seen in A&E; they die whilst waiting for life-saving treatment after diagnosis; they die as a result of rampant disorganisation. How the report you cited can disentangle those deaths from the deaths allegedly caused by staff shortage which (again allegedly) were caused by Brexit must be open to debate and should be treated cautiously rather than with reverence.
But leaving the NHS aside (which was covered comprehensively in your post on this topic yesterday) it might be better to concentrate on your general point.
Yesterday you suggested that the politicians who enacted a policy with which you did not agree should be charged with manslaughter. Today you’ve moved on to lay culpability with the electorate who, when asked a binary question in a referendum, gave their answer.
Your position in that respect is ludicrous. In a democracy voters make their choices from the options offered. In the referendum there were two choices and the majority of those voting voted to leave. What you are saying is that voters must be aware of all the potential consequences of their vote and take personal responsibility for them.
I believe you need a re-think of that philosophy because it is ridiculous.
I have only one regret over Brexit.
That regret is that we didn' have and still don' t have polititians willing or able to negotiate on our behalf.
They are without exception weak wristed appologists. They back down at the sight of a mere feather. What we have always needed is our own Trump to kick arze and shake the establishment out of their self induced stupour.
Brexit want the problem the government was (and continues to be).