Football0 min ago
A Sensible And Fair Immigratiln Policy?
15 Answers
How would you design a sensible and fair immigration policy, and make provision for getting rid of undesirables?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Theland. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Since a huge proportion of undesirables are home grown I would happily send both them and the non home grown nasties to a large island in the middle of a very large ocean.... both groups should be treated equally.....of course we are then left with the children of said nasties who should be helped to grow up to be useful members of society....
Fair and sensible?
"Sensible" is inviting foreigners to fill a skills gap. And "fair" is saying we don't mind where you come from. But we will ask the question which candidate is more likely to fit in - or not.
You've noticed that I've applied a basic moral rule about immigration policy: that it should be designed to benefit the host nation.
"Sensible" is inviting foreigners to fill a skills gap. And "fair" is saying we don't mind where you come from. But we will ask the question which candidate is more likely to fit in - or not.
You've noticed that I've applied a basic moral rule about immigration policy: that it should be designed to benefit the host nation.
If it were up to me I'd implement an Australian style of immigration policy. One based on a points system that was itself based on the employment needs of the nation. Simple really.
If you're a highly qualified foreign heart surgeon and we have a surfeit of heart surgeons, thanks but no visa for you I'm afraid. If you're a highly qualified mason and we have a deficit of masons, welcome.
This system is great because; a) it doesn't discriminate on the basis of colour, religion, sex, sexual preference, age, etc. and b) the most qualified for a specific task get to live and work and pay income tax in the UK. Win, win as far as I can see. The unqualified or the not required qualified do not enter.
Only people hell bent on a nation's destruction and/or want unfettered immigration because they believe it will enhance their election prospects advocate for open door immigration policies.
If you're a highly qualified foreign heart surgeon and we have a surfeit of heart surgeons, thanks but no visa for you I'm afraid. If you're a highly qualified mason and we have a deficit of masons, welcome.
This system is great because; a) it doesn't discriminate on the basis of colour, religion, sex, sexual preference, age, etc. and b) the most qualified for a specific task get to live and work and pay income tax in the UK. Win, win as far as I can see. The unqualified or the not required qualified do not enter.
Only people hell bent on a nation's destruction and/or want unfettered immigration because they believe it will enhance their election prospects advocate for open door immigration policies.
As for the “undesirables” I assume you mean criminals who are not UK nationals?
If so, I'd go for a combination of number of offences with a sliding scale. For instance, murder, rape, GBH, etc., incarceration and immediate deportation. Lesser offences such as ABH, would be a two-strike rule and then deportation. Minor offences would be three-strike rule and then deportation.
If so, I'd go for a combination of number of offences with a sliding scale. For instance, murder, rape, GBH, etc., incarceration and immediate deportation. Lesser offences such as ABH, would be a two-strike rule and then deportation. Minor offences would be three-strike rule and then deportation.
Theland
Fat chance. Everyone is terrified of being labelled a racist or an Islamophobe if they increase “stop-n-search” amongst those groups.
We truly live in a terrifying Orwellian world where it is seen as racist to routinely stop and search the very demographic that is responsible for the majority of knife crime in the UK. We must be living in a bizarre alternate reality where the Koran contains literal verses that explicitly state that Muslims should murder the unbelievers and when this fact is pointed out, the person stating this patently demonstrable truth is ridiculed and/or gets his post deleted on social media....
Three, two, one....
Fat chance. Everyone is terrified of being labelled a racist or an Islamophobe if they increase “stop-n-search” amongst those groups.
We truly live in a terrifying Orwellian world where it is seen as racist to routinely stop and search the very demographic that is responsible for the majority of knife crime in the UK. We must be living in a bizarre alternate reality where the Koran contains literal verses that explicitly state that Muslims should murder the unbelievers and when this fact is pointed out, the person stating this patently demonstrable truth is ridiculed and/or gets his post deleted on social media....
Three, two, one....
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.