SIGN UP

Fascist Government Want To Put Him Back In Prison.

Avatar Image
pumpjack | 05:12 Fri 10th Aug 2018 | Society & Culture
41 Answers
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?zx=kkgvf9yfz1lr#inbox/FMfcgxvxBXrxgqzbrngfsLzPCbNGlhhN

tortured , starved while other cons such as peadophiles and rapists and murderes got to buy what ever they like from the prison tuck shop.
solitary confinment with human excrement was thrown through his cell window while peadophiles and scum were let out to play pool and go to gym & yard & watch tv in their cell etc
this is just not right ...i hope there will be a massive backlash to this.

who are the real scum ?
the real scum are in power IMO

Answers

1 to 20 of 41rss feed

1 2 3 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by pumpjack. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
your link is google sign in ?
Let me guess. That seasoned criminal with a track record of violence, tax fraud, passport fraud, paragon, contempt of court x2 but now apparently a pargon of truth Tommy Robinson.
I think khandro's 250+ post thread full of twaddle covered it several times over
^Don't know why the word paragon changed places
I asked this on the other thread but didn’t get an answer. Should the nature of the crime dictate the treatment a prisoner can expect?
Have you stopped taking your medication, pumpjack?
I asked this on the other thread. Is there any evidence that what Tommy Robinson claims is anywhere close to being 100% true given that his claim was dismissed- as are thousands of such complaints from prisoners every year I expect. No. (it may come in time, although I doubt it, but some seem to swallow whatever Tommy says and cannot see that he might just have an agenda)
//some seem to swallow whatever Tommy says and cannot see that he might just have an agenda//

haha! Not that you haven't.
Should the nature of the crime dictate the treatment a prisoner can expect?
Solitary confinement is used when considered appropriate- eg for protection when inmates are considered vulnerable.
What's my agenda? I don't lead a group and have thousands of twitter follwers and youtubers who hang on my coat tails. My only agenda here is to try to help the gullible see when they are being manipulated.
Anyway, I'm off before it becomes the naomi and FF debate.
// That seasoned criminal with a track record of violence, tax fraud, passport fraud, paragon, contempt of court....Tommy Robinson//

You've omitted his three parking tickets and a caution as a nine year old for scrumpimg, Fiction Factory.

But why have you omitted the most serious charge against Robinson, that he colluded in the rape of hundreds of vulnerable under-age girls?
I'm not saying that tax fraud is a less serious crime than the rape of a twelve-year old, of course. Only that I think so.

When determining the right direction to point people use different moral compasses. Equally valid I'm sure.

Don't want to swap with yours, though.
That too? He's even more of a vile creature than I imagined.
Muse to self: have I offended a site rule?
Isn’t everyone being a bit hasty. Maybe this is about a genuine political prisoner languishing in a fascist government jail.
The link didn’t work ...
As I understand it, prisoners have a penchant for attacking people who offend their ‘code of conduct’. Therefore, it isn’t beyond the realms of possibility, or surprising, that Tommy Robinson, incarcerated in an institution containing the highest proportion of Muslim offenders in the country, found himself to be unpopular. I doubt very much that any of them would have been inviting him to tea.
>I'm not saying that tax fraud is a less serious crime than the rape of a twelve-year old, of course. Only that I think so.

Actually it was mortgage fraud but if you think other people's worse crimes mean we can overlook Robinson's serial offences (assualt, enetering the US illegally, mortgage fraud, contempt of court x2) then that's your opinion.

Besides, if Robinson really was so concerned about the crime why did he risk damagaing the trial?

Anyway, all crimes should be punished and in this case are being/have been dealt with- the Pakistani grooming gangs as well as Robinson's crimes and the crimes of every other inmate in the prison.

//if you think other people's worse crimes mean we can overlook Robinson's serial offences//

But ..... should the nature of his crimes determine the standard of treatment he receives in prison?
Ah- a hypothetical question
I don't answer loaded hypothetical questions and I'm not getting involved in debates with youanyway on this naomi. Same old, same old
Not hypothetical. See my post at 07:42.

1 to 20 of 41rss feed

1 2 3 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Fascist Government Want To Put Him Back In Prison.

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.