Brexiteers Destroyed Britains Future,...
News1 min ago
Clinton.....just Saying
66 Answers
so, Bill Clinton had an affair with an intern, fathered a baby (possibly more than one) and abandoned him. Hillary defended a child rapist, had people killed in Benghazi, deleted 33k emails on a private server, systematically created and armed ISIS, had 6 billion dollars unaccounted for as Secretary of State. And the media doesn't care. Donald Trump said something 11 years ago in a "locker room conversation" and the media is now going crazy.
The hypocrisy is astounding!
trumps performance at the debate was lame and weak , he was not assretive enough and should have fired more shots such as bengazhi etc, the man did not even mention what mass immigration of islamics to france and germany are doing at this very moment, he certainly let himself down and i am now wishing that cruze had won the republican vote .
trump i fear now has let us down and will not win. on the other hand if that lying b***h wins then she will get 4 years and only 4.
democrats will definately lose next time around !!!
The hypocrisy is astounding!
trumps performance at the debate was lame and weak , he was not assretive enough and should have fired more shots such as bengazhi etc, the man did not even mention what mass immigration of islamics to france and germany are doing at this very moment, he certainly let himself down and i am now wishing that cruze had won the republican vote .
trump i fear now has let us down and will not win. on the other hand if that lying b***h wins then she will get 4 years and only 4.
democrats will definately lose next time around !!!
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by dieseldick. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
http://
go on, try defend her, the evidence is there for all to see, its not some right wing conspiracy .
go on, try defend her, the evidence is there for all to see, its not some right wing conspiracy .
That's what solicitors and barristers have to do.
You probably won't bother to watch the vid FF or you will watch it and pretend you haven't (because bizarrely that's what you do)
She claimed she tried to get out of defending him but that was a blatant lie.
From her own lips ... 'Would I do it as a favor to him '
You probably won't bother to watch the vid FF or you will watch it and pretend you haven't (because bizarrely that's what you do)
She claimed she tried to get out of defending him but that was a blatant lie.
From her own lips ... 'Would I do it as a favor to him '
"Hillary defended a child rapist"
Yes, that was her job. Actually at the time she was probably defending someone accused of child rape. That's what solicitors and barristers have to do. It's the way that the justice system work.
fiction, what a sad excuse !! people in power and especially lawyers and especially where children are involved have a duty to that child to tell the truth and be honest.
MY GOD !!
Yes, that was her job. Actually at the time she was probably defending someone accused of child rape. That's what solicitors and barristers have to do. It's the way that the justice system work.
fiction, what a sad excuse !! people in power and especially lawyers and especially where children are involved have a duty to that child to tell the truth and be honest.
MY GOD !!
My answer wa srelevant to the thread and that's what matters.
You are not selling this video are you! As I work as well I use my time in the way I think best. I follow the news on radio 4 and read the Times, for example. Watching unknown links when someone just says "look at this " without selling it to me doesn't appeal to me. It doesn't imply ignorance/head in the sands either- although I know you draw that inference. You may have more time on your hands. Good luck to you Talbot. Just saying
You are not selling this video are you! As I work as well I use my time in the way I think best. I follow the news on radio 4 and read the Times, for example. Watching unknown links when someone just says "look at this " without selling it to me doesn't appeal to me. It doesn't imply ignorance/head in the sands either- although I know you draw that inference. You may have more time on your hands. Good luck to you Talbot. Just saying
dieseldick. So you would have people accused of a crime just convicted without a trial?
Everyone has a right to a trial and to be defended, no matter what the crime or the circumstances. A lawyer has to defend his / her client to the best of their ability no matter what they personally think of them or if they believe them to be innocent or not! That is the basic tenet of law.
Lawyers defend people who they know are guilty every day of the year , that is their job!
Everyone has a right to a trial and to be defended, no matter what the crime or the circumstances. A lawyer has to defend his / her client to the best of their ability no matter what they personally think of them or if they believe them to be innocent or not! That is the basic tenet of law.
Lawyers defend people who they know are guilty every day of the year , that is their job!
"She claimed she tried to get out of defending him but that was a blatant lie."
My understanding is that court records indicate the opposite. At any rate it's fairly well-documented that she was reluctant to take the case.
It's an odd mixture of crimes you are accusing Clinton of. Deleting emails and sanctioning murder in the same breath? I am trying to understand which you think is worse (the murder thing isn't true anyway).
"And the media doesn't care."
Not actually true. Most of Clinton's record has been scrutinised by the media in general for years and years and years. It's just that Trump in the last year has had even more attention that tends to overwhelm that given to Clinton. But don't pretend there is none.
As for the "lying b***h" finish -- I despair of the language used in modern politics.
My understanding is that court records indicate the opposite. At any rate it's fairly well-documented that she was reluctant to take the case.
It's an odd mixture of crimes you are accusing Clinton of. Deleting emails and sanctioning murder in the same breath? I am trying to understand which you think is worse (the murder thing isn't true anyway).
"And the media doesn't care."
Not actually true. Most of Clinton's record has been scrutinised by the media in general for years and years and years. It's just that Trump in the last year has had even more attention that tends to overwhelm that given to Clinton. But don't pretend there is none.
As for the "lying b***h" finish -- I despair of the language used in modern politics.
>fiction, what a sad excuse !! people in power and especially lawyers and especially where children are involved have a duty to that child to tell the truth and be honest
Yes. they need to follow the appropriate code of ethics, the law and their duties to the court. But you didn't mention the duty to serve their client.
You may want to read this if you want further info- it relates to the Law Society here but the same principles apply in the US
http://
Yes. they need to follow the appropriate code of ethics, the law and their duties to the court. But you didn't mention the duty to serve their client.
You may want to read this if you want further info- it relates to the Law Society here but the same principles apply in the US
http://
mikey4444
Nothing that you have listed makes Trump a suitable President Dick....he is an ignorant, foul-mouthed, racist bigoted boor.
mikey you are very fond of telling others posters to stick to the subject and go start their own thread if they want to talk about something else
On a scale of 1 to 10 ... how hypocritical are you being here?
Nothing that you have listed makes Trump a suitable President Dick....he is an ignorant, foul-mouthed, racist bigoted boor.
mikey you are very fond of telling others posters to stick to the subject and go start their own thread if they want to talk about something else
On a scale of 1 to 10 ... how hypocritical are you being here?
Talbot...that was just an unnecessary outburst. I am pointing out that whatever Dick, or any other of the few AB Trump fans left say, he still isn't qualified to be President.
Dick's post is unfocused and rambling. For instance, what has the amount of Muslims in France or Germany possibly got to do with the outcome of the American Election ?
When the Republicans lose on a few weeks time, they will have lost 3 Elections in a row, and yet Dick is predicting what will happen in Election number 4, in 2020 !
Dick's post is unfocused and rambling. For instance, what has the amount of Muslims in France or Germany possibly got to do with the outcome of the American Election ?
When the Republicans lose on a few weeks time, they will have lost 3 Elections in a row, and yet Dick is predicting what will happen in Election number 4, in 2020 !
Latest Posts
Technology2 mins ago
Body & Soul17 mins ago
News26 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles41 mins ago
