ChatterBank0 min ago
Potty sounds
5 Answers
A few years ago, some archaeologists had a crazy theory that sounds from man's distant past may have been unwittingly recorded in the grooves made in clay pots as they spun upon the potter's wheel, and were planning to conduct experiments to see if they could hear anything.
Does anybody know if anything ever came of this?
Does anybody know if anything ever came of this?
Answers
1 to 5 of 5
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by AndiFlatland. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
The Discovery Channel show Mythbusters pretty much disproved that discernable sounds could be recorded, although some generic acoustic phenomena can be found on pottery.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archaeoacoustics
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archaeoacoustics
Thanks to the 3 of you.
Kempie:
I didn't know there had been a programme about it on the Discovery Channel - mainly bacause I'm one of the diminishing number of people who are resisting all exhortations to add a vast number of new channels to the 5 I already have, and which I find perfectly adequate! Obviously I'm missing out here and there, as this gap in my knowledge proves.
The title of the programme, you say, was Mythbusters - was this the same series as one that went out on BBC2 earlier this year? I saw most of those programmes, and don't recall any of the items being about this particular topic. It could have been in one of those I missed, of course.
Wildwood:
Ah! A right old cynic there, eh! Yes, it is amazing just what apparently hairbrained ideas people come up with, and how much money they can get granted from public funds for their investigations, isn't it? Such an idea may not be imbued with the possibility of finding the answer to life, the universe and everything - but they said Arthur C.Clarke was bonkers when he had the idea in 1947 of bouncing radio signals off little spacecraft in geostationary orbit. Without him, how much longer may we have had to wait for the Discovery Channel to rise above the horizon? :-)
Riskman:
Remains interesting indeed - and who knows where such ideas may lead us?
Now all we have to do is find some ancient form of accidental video recorder, so we can really find out how they built the Pyramids, and why they built Stonehenge! Anybody out there want to take up that one? (No, come on, I'm only joking... or am I?)
Kempie:
I didn't know there had been a programme about it on the Discovery Channel - mainly bacause I'm one of the diminishing number of people who are resisting all exhortations to add a vast number of new channels to the 5 I already have, and which I find perfectly adequate! Obviously I'm missing out here and there, as this gap in my knowledge proves.
The title of the programme, you say, was Mythbusters - was this the same series as one that went out on BBC2 earlier this year? I saw most of those programmes, and don't recall any of the items being about this particular topic. It could have been in one of those I missed, of course.
Wildwood:
Ah! A right old cynic there, eh! Yes, it is amazing just what apparently hairbrained ideas people come up with, and how much money they can get granted from public funds for their investigations, isn't it? Such an idea may not be imbued with the possibility of finding the answer to life, the universe and everything - but they said Arthur C.Clarke was bonkers when he had the idea in 1947 of bouncing radio signals off little spacecraft in geostationary orbit. Without him, how much longer may we have had to wait for the Discovery Channel to rise above the horizon? :-)
Riskman:
Remains interesting indeed - and who knows where such ideas may lead us?
Now all we have to do is find some ancient form of accidental video recorder, so we can really find out how they built the Pyramids, and why they built Stonehenge! Anybody out there want to take up that one? (No, come on, I'm only joking... or am I?)
1 to 5 of 5
