Donate SIGN UP

L G B T – B B C Woman’S Hour Asks The Wrong Question

Avatar Image
naomi24 | 09:26 Thu 28th Mar 2019 | News
33 Answers
Woman’s Hour posed the question ‘Do you think LGBT rights should be taught in schools?’ amid the continuing row in Birmingham. Twitter users and listeners slammed the organisation for its poorly-worded question, saying it opened up the platform to bigotry.

Responses included this:

//‘Why even frame this as a question? Doing so clearly legitimises ‘no’ as an answer, which is hugely damaging.’//

That is dangerous territory.

Why shouldn’t ‘No’ be a legitimate answer and is it acceptable to frame questions in such a way as to offer only limited responses that suit any particular agenda?

https://metro.co.uk/2019/03/26/bbc-fire-asking-lgbt-rights-taught-school-9030166/
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 33rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by naomi24. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
There should be an opportunity to voice both sides of opinion in any debate.
I agree No is a perfectly valid answer. Especially as the start of the question is "do you think" making it rather open to personal opinions and maybe even anecdotes.

That is not to say i think the answer should be No.
There are only 2 answers to the question as posed; yes and no. As has been said, a very poorly worded question. Probably set by the same person who sets the questions for the Sunday Express Surveys - which nearly always end up with a 99% positive response.
I think that is an incredibly badly worded question, not least because it encourages a "yes/no" answer which is inflammatory and doesn't promote reasoned discussion.....having said that, I think its dangerous to try to stifle opinions that we don't like.
Question Author
Ken/Woofgang, why isn't it okay to say 'No' if that's what you think?
Ken/Woofgang

How would you two have worded the question?
I didn't say that it wasn't ok to say no....in fact I said that stifling opinions we don't like is dangerous. I do think though that if you seek to open a discussion and not just to get closed answers, then the question needs to be worded better than that one....surely "no because" or "yes because" are a better option than simply yes or no.
Question Author
Woofgang, I don't think the question was asked with the purpose of initiating a discussion. More of a 'yes' or 'no' poll.
It's not really an accurate summary of the issue in Birmingham - that was over whether or not primary school children should be taught about same-sex relationships. Not at all the same question as 'Should gay rights be taught in schools?' - 'rights' involves a bit more than just basic awareness of non-heterosexual relationships and obviously also includes secondary education too - where as far as I'm aware there was no controversy about it being discussed. I imagine whoever wrote the question for the episode was asked to concisely write a question to discuss the Birmingham dispute and didn't think it through for whatever reason.

Obviously it's not fair to say that 'no' is an invalid response because being homophobic is not illegal, but asking a question like that does inherently lend a microphone to people who object to any form of education about gay people whatsoever at any point in schooling. I.e. it goes considerably beyond the issue that people were actually arguing about in Birmingham and lights a fire where there wasn't one before.
Yes, but with the option that parents may request that their child may be excused that particular lesson.In my class at school was one Jewish boy who was excused RE lessons.
Question Author
Krom, //it's not fair to say that 'no' is an invalid response because being homophobic is not illegal//

Neither is it fair to assume that anyone says ‘no’ because they are homophobic. There are other reasons for saying ‘no’. Many parents prefer to deal with some issues themselves and answer questions if and when they arise. That doesn’t make them ‘homophobic’.
Question Author
Danny, the point is should 'no' be a legitimate answer or should questions that are likely to elicit a 'no' response from anyone be worded in such as way as to prevent that?
Naomi, sorry, I misunderstood the question.Can't see anything wrong with posing a question that only requires a yes or no answer.
To be really honest, I think it is a tad homophobic to be against *any* education whatsoever about gay rights anywhere in the school system. I don't see why anyone who wasn't at least somewhat homophobic would have a problem with that.
Being excused from RE is one thing. Being excused from learning about relationships is something else.

For example, two women have a child in primary school. One or other of them, sometimes both, is waiting at the gates to drop the child off and pick them up each day.

How are child's classmates who are children of religious parents to learn what on earth is going on? From their parents? Clearly not. From the child? Not a great idea. Leave them to figure it out for themselves? Sure, while they're at it they can figure out Pythagoras's theorem from first principles too.

There's no need for a discussion of how lesbians have sex. Just a discussion about the different types of relationship. It equips children for living in the UK.
Ellipsis, as far as Muslims are concerned this is a matter of religion.
Question Author
Krom, //I think it is a tad homophobic to be against *any* education whatsoever about gay rights anywhere in the school system. //

Okay, let's say, for arguments sake, that a parent disapproves of the homosexual lifestyle, and for that reason considers it their responsibility to answer a child's questions if and when they arise and in whichever manner they choose. Is it okay for them to answer 'No'.
The binary options of Yes/No don't allow for any qualification.
You might disagree with 7 year olds being taught about LGBT rights 'in school', but agree that 13 year olds ought to 'in school'.

So which option do you plump for?
Question Author
Jackthehat, In that case I would consider the younger child first and plump for 'No'.
Maybe a better question would have been "Who should teach children about LGBT rights/relationships/whatever?" School, parents, nobody, etc...

1 to 20 of 33rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

L G B T – B B C Woman’S Hour Asks The Wrong Question

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.