ChatterBank0 min ago
The BBC has become a byword for waste
90 Answers
Another good article from the paper of truth
http://www.dailymail....aces-savage-cuts.html
Do you agree that the BBC has become a byword for waste
http://www.dailymail....aces-savage-cuts.html
Do you agree that the BBC has become a byword for waste
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by RebelSouls. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Well I admire your tenacity. I'm sure there is scope for savings in expenditure and there is also a valid debate to be had about how the licence fee should be funded. For example I think the present system is unfair and open to abuse- I understand over half a million households who watch TV get away with not having a licence.
I'm still not clear though what is driving you, as a non-licence payer, to take such an interest in how licence fee payers' money is spent.
I'm still not clear though what is driving you, as a non-licence payer, to take such an interest in how licence fee payers' money is spent.
To many faces on sports programmes .Does it take three sometimes four to state the obvious. show the game sack liniker lawerence hanson and the other famous name I cant remember .Sue loydd and the panelists on that worn out show ...Have one presenter on the one show ..Forget about talk shows do we need them .Get rid of leastenders That will be a tiny step but it would at least show they thought about it .
Have a read Rebel...no matter how many times you try and convince us you still remain in the minority and you're becoming a complete bore..
http://www.theanswerb...V/Question925592.html
http://www.theanswerb...V/Question925592.html
Any large company, with a few exceptions, will become bloated and wasteful.
You just have to look at a couple of 'great british institutions' to see that. BBC and British Airways for starters. One has more money than sence and squanders money just because they can and the other has staff (union) so greedy it is willing to bankrupt a company that has made millions in losses for the past umpteen years.
As a general rule I don't think the tv liceince fee is worth it.
We are all used to adverts so we might just as well go the whole hog and the bbc becomes independant gets advertisers and can then spend as much as they like on taxis and so called talent.
You just have to look at a couple of 'great british institutions' to see that. BBC and British Airways for starters. One has more money than sence and squanders money just because they can and the other has staff (union) so greedy it is willing to bankrupt a company that has made millions in losses for the past umpteen years.
As a general rule I don't think the tv liceince fee is worth it.
We are all used to adverts so we might just as well go the whole hog and the bbc becomes independant gets advertisers and can then spend as much as they like on taxis and so called talent.
Latest Posts
How it Works1 min ago
Who Inherits If Children Are Adopted ?
Law5 mins ago
Crosswords10 mins ago
News13 mins ago
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.