L'Aquila( why didn't the Pope go there)

Avatar Image
Joy11 | 10:51 Sat 11th Apr 2009 | News
4 Answers
The site of the many coffins and tiny white caskets laid on top of them in the devastated town of L'Aquila in Italy after the Earthquake struck was heartbreaking, but why couldn't the Pope visit and give these people his message personally? instead of his messenger doing it, I know Easter has to be one of the buisiest in the papal calendar, but Rome wasn;t that far from there and one of the aftershocks were felt there, I think he may have made himself more accessable to his people if he done this, I am a non-catholic but I've no doubt his predecessor Pope John -Paul would have made that small journey, even for an hour or so.


1 to 4 of 4rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Joy11. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Well, Joy, it was on the news a few days ago saying he would be visiting the area - didn't specify when, though.
Question Author
mornin' paraffin, how are you today?
He will no doubt go there, but it would have showed humanity for him to go when it happened, not when the dust has pun intended.
Maybe it was thought best not at the time . I would think a Papal visit would attract a lot of followers . Where would they sleep for a start , transport problems etc
Popes traditionally hold off on visiting crisis zones to avoid disrupting rescue and recovery efforts. After a September 1997 quake killed 10 people in the Umbria region, the late Pope John Paul II waited until January 1998 to visit.

1 to 4 of 4rss feed

Do you know the answer?

L'Aquila( why didn't the Pope go there)

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.