Donate SIGN UP

Whingers

Avatar Image
paulos66 | 15:46 Thu 15th Nov 2007 | News
41 Answers
Isn't the pride of playing for your country enough for these people:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/women /7095951.stm
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 41rss feed

1 2 3 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by paulos66. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I feel sorry for them, they won't buy many pairs of shoes with that.
I wonder if the male British football team, would play for �40.00 per day????? (or if they will ever reach the quarter finals of the world cup in the forseable future, or indeed quallify for euro 2008!)

Surly this is just taking the pi$$
Question Author
They will if they shop about, after all that's what they're good at - not football
Question Author
Just to put in perspective, the average premiership player has earned that in less than 30 minutes (in his sleep) proving once and for all women shouldn't play football
........nor talk about it!
Question Author
Must try harder in future
Paul, surley that's a contradiction in terms. If he was asleep how did he 'earn' it? He was paid it, he did not 'earn' it.

I feel we should support any sports person male or female, regardless of weather we personnaly like/follow the sport. They are after all representing us as a Country.
Load of old rubbish like womens rugby
"Eniola Aluko" what a quintessentially English name.

Good God.
Question Author
horse, that was just me massaging the figures (insert sexist joke here ); but seriuosly though have you ever watched womens football
Question Author
Well spotted belway, now what 'll we do about owen hargreaves
�40 per day is more than enough for a bunch of talentless women, most of which are probably immigrants anyway.

Even if a football man is on say �40,000 per week, he is 1000x more talented, more exiting to watch and more deserved.

If the women players can prove they have the star appeal then I can guarantee decent sponser deals will be flying in like women tennis.

But they won't becaause womens football is a complete waste of time.

I am not the least bit sexist, but they really are better served working in a more feminine role, or staying at home either breast feeding or at least thinking about it.

I am always in awe of the standard of goalkeeping/defending. Is it a rule of womens football never to have met until you kick off lol
Isn't Hargreaves a Canadian name?
Question Author
Exactly cambus
Christ, your be telling me Lennox Lewis and Greg Rusedski aren't English next, let alone Kevin Pieterson and umptenn other English cricketers.
Ah shut it you lot, you know nothing.

While the womens football is usually dire the fact remains that more than �40 per day should have been paid.

Now lets talk about those lovely lads in footie that actually earn their pay and sponsor ships. There are some great footballers setting fine examples to other granny grabbers, drug abusers, alchie and adulterers out there. And I hear they all enjoy a nice roast on a Sunday too.
Lets add it all up
�40 x 7 = �280
�280 x 5 = �1400 Gross pay
Minus 25% tax + Nat Ins etc = aprox �1050 net,
Hardly a whinge is it?
And lets face the fcats that all their expenses are paid, they actually only train for a few hours a day (which can easily be spent in a gym anyway) and how long is a game of football??

90 mins plus a bit of injury allowane!!!!

The minimum wage is �5.60p.h (there abouts).

Bloody women. Moan moan moan.
Since nobody watches womens football, I'm surprised they were paid anything at all.

1 to 20 of 41rss feed

1 2 3 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Whingers

Answer Question >>