Labour To Send Failed Asylum Seekers Abroad.....

[ToraToraTora]

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c8re55z8kv7o

Wonder where they got that idea from!

[naomi24]

// the prime minister said the government would begin discussions about sending asylum seekers abroad for processing after their claims had been rejected in the UK.//

 

Firstly it takes an age to process claims for asylum - meanwhile thousands more are still pouring in unchallenged - and secondly, what are they processing once claims have been rejected?  

 

More hot air from this impotent, duplicitous man.

[youngmafbog]

Dont care solong as he does it.

The problem is, he wont.  He is a HR lawyer at heart.

[Hymie]

If only we were still members of the EU, under the Dublin Agreement we could send them back to the first safe country they entered, or where they had previously applied for asylum.

 

Who amongst us would have been stupid enough to vote leave?

[newmodarmy]

More nonsense in there than truth, hymie and gulliver. How could we have sent them back to the first country they applied to for asylum when they deliberately travel without papers? And given that for some reason they generally leave North Africa or wherever with the aim of coming to Britain, why would they have applied elsewhere enroute? And if they had had asylum denied somewhere in the EU why are they still in the EU and free to wander round the French beaches waiting for a dinghy?

[youngmafbog]

Cobblers hymie.

You lost anyway so get over it.

[newmodarmy]

The gulliver post I'm referring to is on his own separate thread today where he's blaming Brexit and Boris for the dinghiy arrivals, like Hymie is here

[Hymie]

If they came on a boat from France, we could justifiably send them back to France (being a safe country).

[ynnafymmi]

@12.42."Who would be stupid enough to vote leave"?  29% of SNP voters for a start Hymie.☹

[youngmafbog]

The real question is who would be stupid enough to be shackled to the EU.

Hymie I suppose.

You lost, keep chomping those sour grapes.

[Massey65]

Hymie -12.27 - I can just see France taking them back with open arms - I don't think so !!!!

[Hymie]

Brexiteers hate the truth, with no returns agreement our hands are tied:-

 

 

[youngmafbog]

Hymie, you are being spectaculalry lean with the truth.

See the posts above that explain why you are talking rot.

[sandyRoe]

Instead of paying vast sums of money to other countries, why not utilise what we've got?

The Falkland Islands are scantily populated.

Send the failed asylum seekers there or offer them return transport to their homeland.

[newmodarmy]

Were we returning all the dinghy  travellers back to France pre Brexit Hymie?

According to that video France wants to fix the fact that there;s no returns policy.  So why don't they? Because they prefer to wave them on their way.

Does anyone know what would happen if someone flew or got the Eurostar from Paris to London then destroyed  their passport/ID papers and claimed asylum at London? Would they be returned to France ( I think they would) or would we have to put them up in a  hotel and let them wander round while their asylum application is considered?

[fender62]

the uk is swamped with illegals waiting processing and more arriving, like pushing the tide back with a broom, as was said two tier is was a human rights lawyer and due process is the defacto, and not your broke in your not getting processed but returned, regardless of the country your from, and no i don't care if it's war torn, go fight for your country then...

[webbo3]

They can be sent back to France

\\ Asylum seekers can be returned to their country of origin if it is determined they are not in danger and their lives are not at risk. The principle of non-refoulement, enshrined in the 1951 Refugee Convention, protects individuals from being returned to a country where they face a real risk of persecution or serious harm.//

France is safe..

[New Judge]

“If only we were still members of the EU, under the Dublin Agreement we could send them back to the first safe country they entered, or where they had previously applied for asylum.”

No we couldn’t.

The Dublin Agreement was not worth the paper it was written on. In the last few years of its operation in the UK far more migrants were transferred from the EU into the UK than were transferred out under it. It wasn’t a migrant return agreement at all. All of the  migrants the UK received under its rules had never set foot in the country so they could not have been “returned” here. It was a migrant distribution scheme which the UK did very poorly out of in its latter years. It is highly likely that the UK would have withdrawn from the agreement anyway even if had remained in the EU.

I’ve published the details many times before on here (and will do so again if you dispute my claims).

\\ Asylum seekers can be returned to their country of origin if it is determined they are not in danger and their lives are not at risk. The principle of non-refoulement, enshrined in the 1951 Refugee Convention, protects individuals from being returned to a country where they face a real risk of persecution or serious harm.//

Indeed webbo. But the UN unilaterally declared that Article 31 of their Convention did not actually mean what it said. Instead of disputing that decision, the signatories meekly submitted to it – aided and abetted by Human Rights lawyers like Mr Starmer.

There is no way Mr Starmer's proposals will happen and I  repeat for the 94th time - the only way to deal with illegal migration is to prevent the migrants from landing here. Worrying what to do about them after they have arrived will never work.
 

[ynnafymmi]

I was watching a tv programme last night about the Calais"refugee"camps,the interviewer asked a fake refugee why he wanted to come to the UK,he answered-"I want money,i want house,i want everything".And he will probably get it once he washes up on our shores.

[Canary42]

Labour received overwelming vote at last election.

You lost Tories, so get over it.

[ynnafymmi]

If the labour leadership doesnt get their rear-ends into gear soon Canary,it will be a one term parliament for them.