Donate SIGN UP

The Artist Formerly Known As Mince

Avatar Image
douglas9401 | 20:23 Mon 28th Apr 2025 | News
15 Answers

People urged to get a grip as straight faces declare 50m Euro price tag.

It's like a vandalised inner city fence panel.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cz6dvdwjpj4o

Gravatar

Answers

1 to 15 of 15rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by douglas9401. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.

Aye, absolutely ruined!

 

Is it the right way up?

Get a bit of T- Cut on it - problem solved 

While disapproving of damaging art; it is clearly not something worth €50m.  I don't know how much the materials cost but at most the labour is probably a day's worth at, say, €400 a day ? Maybe.

 

This is the issue when art is defined by those calling themselves artists and valued by those with less sense than money, and who are gullible enough to buy into anything they're told.

Some amusing examples in the link - especially the Dutch Town Hall throwing some art works away with the rubbish (including an Andy Warhol).

Details here :- 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cnv58ejyrpzo

I wonder if they will be charged 😀

Serves them right for employing someone with sense and taste to do the renovation job. Should've know better.

50m€ ?

Ok - if you bought that you would have been spotted coming a parsec away 

Must stand for milli, not Mega.

It looks like one Tony Hancock did a few years back.

Grey, orange on maroon no. 8

Does that mean there's another 7 of these pieces of doo-doo out there?

Oh lawdy! Canary, we should get together and create summat and sell it for mega bucks :) x

A corrugated sheet of metal, painted blue in the dips and white on the ridges and call it 'Condors view over Peru', probably some daftie would enthuse about it lol

🤣

I get that whether art is liked or not is subjective, but even with that there is an awful lot of emperor's new clothes.

 

The gushing flowery language in the link below is laughable given some of the subject's artwork includes placing blutack on walls and crumpling up a sheet of A4 paper.

 

https://www.tate.org.uk/whats-on/tate-britain/turner-prize-2001/turner-prize-2001-artists-martin-creed

 

As for the damaged painting, I just struggle to comprehend how it can be valued at 50m Euros.

Au contraire Douglé. When Rothko painted this in 1960, I'll bet he maybe got a few hundred dollars for it. Like the piece or not, subsequent price hikes are nothing to do with the original 'value.'

These are two separate issues. Money talks. In fact it positively screams 'investment' in your ear. The investment element leaves the original artist well out of it.

I've always liked Rothko (puts on tin hat.)  Come back in 5 or 10 years when it's 75m   😏

1 to 15 of 15rss feed

Do you know the answer?

The Artist Formerly Known As Mince

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.