Immature And Pathetic

[Teapots1]

Boris resorting to getting the sympathy vote from the public to save his skin. Allowing the Daily Mail to display Carrie and baby on front page, so the baby had covid, so have thousands of others.

Does he really think that this is going to win back MPs and everyone else. And for those who may think that the PM didn't have anything to do with this publication, a top journalist said late last night that the Daily Mail would have had to ask Boris's permission first before hand. Embarrassing fight back using you're Wife and child.

[Bobbisox1]

Barsel I respect your view , I guess it’s right when someone said, never argue politics or religion :0)

[Teapots1]

Bullmuck? The Mail published the article with the permission of Boris Pat. Pathetic!!

[Stickybottle]

naomi24
Ahh, now I know why you're so confused, Stickybottle. You can't read. I didn't say he 'united' the populace. Try again.
———
Indeed
My faux pas
Boris cannot unite his own party so he will definitely not unite the populace !

[pat2604]

Who was the top journalist teapots.

[Barsel]

I'm not arguing with you Bobbs, I'm just saying I think of him/see him in a completely different way.
I would never argue with you, it really is just a difference of opinion.
Usually I seem to agree with Naomi so I was surprised I don't on this.
We are all different in the way we see things and as you know some Abers end up falling out, but I would never do that with you as you are one of my faves. :-) xx

[Bobbisox1]

Awww , that’s kind of you , yes often there’s daggers drawn with opinions but I think if you can also see the other persons point of view , it calms the waters x

[Teapots1]

Pat I can't remember it was on late last night, I think it was BBC when they review the next mornings papers. But he was the only one who really had the galls to see it for what it was, and say so.

[youngmafbog]

It's 'very convenient' isnt it.

If it was intended to get people back on side it has failed miserably - just look at the comments in the DM.

[pat2604]

That doesn't mean it's true though does it. I don't trust any journalists these days top or not. And neither do I trust any article where 'a source' has given the information.;0).

[Teapots1]

I think you are missing the point Pat. The photo and report was put on the front page of the Mail with the permission of Boris and Carrie. The Journalist was asked to give his opinion, and he did.

[naomi24]

//a top journalist said late last night that the Daily Mail would have had to ask Boris's permission first before hand. //

Other papers, including the Telegraph, are carrying the story. Articles relating to prominent people are usually handled through a press office or agent.

[andres]

'Immature and pathetic'? Just about describes most of the population spouting the odds against Boris at the moment. Can't say that I am a big fan of his but I think the treatment towards him at the moment is pretty disgusting. For Heaven's sake why don't people transfer some of their anger towards all the other M.P.s who were partying as well. Boris didn't party on his own.
As for his baby having Covid it must have been frightening for him and Carrie. Having had a baby ,at 6 weeks, with whooping cough I know what it's like.
I don't agree at all with the partying at No.10 .Those who set the rules should follow them. What about all those Abers who were boasting and shouting the odds that'' no-one tells me what to do'' and all those thousands making their way to party on the beaches. Yes, I know some of them were fined but a hell of a lot got away with it.

[Stickybottle]

andres
For Heaven's sake why don't people transfer some of their anger towards all the other M.P.s who were partying as well.
———
And they are ? If any other MPs are or were involved I am sure we will know about it

To keep you up to date it appears that it was Downing St staff/civil servants and advisers etc who we’re supposedly at these parties
Some (not just Cummings) even questioned why invites were sent out by the PPS ?
They who attended I am sure will be censured in due course(ask Allegra Stratton)
No other MP or cabinet minister has yet been implicated
I wonder why ?
Maybe they had the sense and foresight to abide by the legislation set out only days before ?
Or were hard at work (minus cheese and wine) in the Palace of Westminster or at their constituencies ?

So many questions eh ?
It is tough though when you are accountable to the public for your actions as PM I suppose

[Stickybottle]

*were not we’re

[douglas9401]

If indeed he did rally the country would the result not be unity?

[Stickybottle]

douglas9401
If indeed he did rally the country would the result not be unity?

I was going to opine as much but decided against it in light of the posters undying and unwavering admiration of Big Dog

[naomi24]

14.50. No.

[pat2604]

/Other papers, including the Telegraph, are carrying the story. Articles relating to prominent people are usually handled through a press office or agent./

True . I was just reading through the front pages and wondering if they needed permission from the PM and wife. The other papers quote the Daily Mail as their source.

[pat2604]

I think the Prime Minister has been very daft, but I don't see all that these parties would have created a serious problem. As for the public outcry, the press and making the most of it and posting all the sob stories they can. The people complaining they couldn't be with their loved ones, Probably because the loved ones were in hospital or care homes where, of course they couldn't. How could the staff in these constituions have managed with visitors getting in the way when wards were packed. It hardly compares with a works get together in a garden. As for the population following all the rules,a vast amount didn't and were up and about mixing with all and sundry.

[naomi24]

I think the permission’ story is a load of bunkum.