Donate SIGN UP

Tories Are Wallowing In Sleaze

Avatar Image
Roobaba | 09:41 Thu 04th Nov 2021 | News
68 Answers

Owen Paterson vote: Tories are wallowing in sleaze, says Sir Keir Starmer
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-59158469

Sleaze rules 'torn up'by 'shameless' Tory MPs
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-the-papers-59158458

.. shamelessness.

Definitions of shamelessness. behaviour marked by a bold defiance of the proprieties and lack of shame. synonyms: brazenness. type of: boldness, daring, hardihood, hardiness. the trait of being willing to undertake things that involve risk or danger.

Sleaze rules OK.. are we bothered?

Gravatar

Answers

41 to 60 of 68rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Roobaba. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
A suspension, could trigger a re/call petition ,it would only need 10% of Owens Constituents to sign, it to cause a By election.
While I welcome the U-turn, it doesn’t look like contrition, it looks more like damage limitation.

And I have to feel sorry for ministerial aide Angela Richardson who was fired for not voting for the amendment.

All a bit of a shambles.
Stableford

Johnson’s U-turn totally undermines your defence of Owen Paterson earlier on this thread.
Emergency debate on Monday, and a proper vote on suspending him.
Well, as a long time Conservative I am totally disgusted Gromit. Until Johnson goes and a proper Tory Government is put in place I for one will not be voting Tory.

Johnson is an utter disgrace and not fit to hold the post of British Prime Minister.
Ymb,

Johnson’s tenancy at No.10 will be remembered for dithering, wrong calls and freeloading by the PM himself and his motley crew.
You forgot highest taxes ever and plunging people into heat poverty. Oh and the lies.

The man is a total disaster.
I agree that Johnson is a disgrace.
This action actually beggars belief: even if Paterson had done nothing wrong, and I’m at pains to see how he could reasonably argue the case, this is a shameless attempt to move the goalposts and get an individual’s case put before a new committee chaired by one of Paterson’s cronies. You’d scarcely dare to make it up.
Why does Johnson keep riding roughshod over recommendations from independent bodies? Priti Patel’s case being another that springs to mind?
Possibly in fact probably because he thinks he’s invincible due to his popularity with certain key voters.
That perception deserves a rude awakening
Johnson has clashed with the parliamentary commission before, and it looks like the opportunity for revenge clouded his judgement.

// Kathryn Stone, the independent Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, has previously castigated the Prime Minister over a lavish £15,000 Caribbean holiday funded by Tory donors.



But he was saved from punishment - which could have included being the first serving premier to be suspended from the Commons, by MPs who overturned her ruling.

She has also pulled him up over an 'over-casual attitude' to declaring his own personal financial interests to Parliament, including a six-figure stake in an English country mansion. //
//Priti Patel’s case being another that springs to mind?//

I happen to know a bit about what went on behind the scenes there. The senior civil servants were being obstructive to the point of refusing to carry out what she asked for, indeed on some occasions doing the opposite. There were other things too.

I suspect that is why she 'got away' with it.
Maybe ymb, and maybe Paterson is largely blameless.

But you should not undermine the independent bodies which deliver their verdict.
Anyway, I see they've backtracked, partially.
was it those same wicked civil servants who forced Priti Patel not to tell her boss that she'd been meeting the Israeli PM, I wonder?
Rules about Paid Advocacy are different in Scottish Parliament and Westminster. In the Scottish Parliament paid advocacy by MSPs is a criminal offence and allegations would be reported to the Procurator Fiscal.
In Westminster Paid Advocacy is banned but it is not a criminal offence. Allegations are investigated by the Standards Commissioner. The House of Commons decide on sanctions for MPs.
He’s resigned !
// He has no responsibility to pay any money back to anyone.//

a whistleblower selflessly endangering his career by telling da troof and er getting paid ( pas de peanuts - £100 000)
as TTT says ( so often) oh pullleaze !

oh by the way - as the wrongly convict er convicts say: you dont usually commit suicide if you havent done it - - (*)



(*) as some say usually black - after fifty years in da slammer - I knew it was God's will but there were times I wasnt sure what that will was....
There was one MP ( tory grandee ) who said,
"my email box was full of it / full this morning (*)- all protesting about sleaze."
my email is full at 180 000, so god knows what he meant

(*)Clare Rayner famously wrote - I have to return to the subject of premature ejaculation this week as my post-bag was full of it after my article last week
Very disappointed that Owen Paterson has been left with no option but to resign. Lets hope the process is reviewed before other families fall victim. Another decent and hardworking MP less at Westminster.
god's sake - he didnt 'have to' resign anymore than you 'have to' post on AB

disgraceful episode

( agree some pople here do seem to have to post)
I agree, lets get rodders into government ASAP.

41 to 60 of 68rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Tories Are Wallowing In Sleaze

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.