Donate SIGN UP

Why Not Just Cancel Females Altogether? (Part Ii - The Truth)

Avatar Image
sp1814 | 11:25 Wed 23rd Jun 2021 | News
76 Answers
Earlier this week someone reacted to the news that the term 'Head Girl' was not going to be used any more at St Paul's Girls school.

If anyone felt that the school was wrong, the truth is now out.

https://twitter.com/danbarker/status/1407385210661003272?s=21

1. Head of School was the original title. They're reverting back to it.
2. The 17 and 18 year olds wanted a title that was more age-appropriate. They were polled on this.

Should we be concerned that newspapers are now frequently writing stories to fit a narrative...to rile up their readers?

Answers

1 to 20 of 76rss feed

1 2 3 4 Next Last

Avatar Image
They gave the pupils the choice of which name they wanted for the role. That's hardly "kowtowing to another PC requirement". This really is a complete non-story, blown up by the press to be something it isn't.
12:10 Wed 23rd Jun 2021
The fact that the pupils wanted it, or at least a majority did, should -- but won't -- put paid to the outrage.
Question Author
jim360

...and the fact that this is the original role title, so you'd think so, but unfortunately outrage is the fuel that powers newspapers and social media.

Once the touch-paper has been lit...
Nothing new, media has always put a slant on their stories paying scant attention to the complete picture. The article headings in some magazines are laughable as long as you take them at face value. One of my favourites, a'quote' from Ruth Langsford, something like "I don't trust Eamonn". Turned out she didnt trust him to load the washing machinne properly.
I don't think I've ever been outraged :-)

Head girl/boy/of school, should be scrapped. Popularity contest.
all of this information was already in naomi24's original link sp1814... and was pointed out. It did nothing to stop the outrage, because being outraged was more important than being honest. It was dismissed with a wave of the hand.
Yes, it was ever thus, but I do believe this tendency has increased exponentially since people began sourcing their news online [not that I believe that news online is a Bad Thing per se].

The less discerning reader enjoys having their prejudices reinforced. 'But I saw it in the Daily Mail!' splutter splutter harrumph ah that's better etc.
It's normally the case with right-wing fixations... "they've banned Christmas", the bendy bananas rule, the so-called "war on woke" (used to be called "PC gone mad" its the same thing)... they are manufactured controversies and all you have to do is wait before the facts come out... Unfortunately in that waiting period the deceptions can cause absolute havoc.
Chinajan@11:48...thats when I definitely take it with a grain of salt.
I see no ‘outrage’ but the word is being bandied about quite liberally here all in an effort to silence those who object to society. kowtowing to yet another PC requirement - and it shows. Must try harder.
you aren't being silenced though are you? :/
and what on earth does it mean to "object to society"?
Question Author
Perhaps it's more prevalent now because newspapers (or rather their online counterparts) need to get eyes on their sites in order to keep up advertising rates.

It's called 'click bait'...where a headline only has a passing relationship with the truth in the story.

They gave the pupils the choice of which name they wanted for the role. That's hardly "kowtowing to another PC requirement". This really is a complete non-story, blown up by the press to be something it isn't.
Untitled- that threw me initially too, but I'm guessing the full stop was a typo. Read it without the stray punctuation.
Ah yes... makes more sense now. We all make typos now and then :)
Question Author
Mozz71.

Your 12.10 answer was spot on. They actually gave the student the choice and it's explained that a) this is reverting to the original name and 17/18 year olds didn't want the word 'girl' in the title.

Difficult to hear that over the sound of huffing and puffing.

And thank you for pointing out the typo. I too couldn't work it out.

BA!
Yeah, well, I think we should still cancel females altogether. They're a pain in the armpit! Hey ho! :o)
'Should we be concerned that newspapers are now frequently writing stories to fit a narrative...to rile up their readers?'

They've been doing it for decades!
Thank you SP.
That someone was me. Why have you posted something that repeats everything that was said in the original thread? Did you not read the original link, SP?

Where’s the lie?

//The school said the main reason for changing the title of head girl was because many senior pupils feel they are young women, but admitted the “binary connotations” were a factor in the decision.

Sarah Fletcher, the school’s high mistress, said in a statement the school “would never encourage a student to ‘be’ anything in relation to their identity”.//

Untitled, //you aren't being silenced though are you? :/

Unfortunately for you, no. As I said you must try harder.

1 to 20 of 76rss feed

1 2 3 4 Next Last

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.