Donate SIGN UP

12 Years, Seriously?

Avatar Image
ToraToraTora | 13:24 Wed 16th Jun 2021 | News
25 Answers
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-57497845
Another subhuman savage that should never see the light of day again. He'll be out in 6 and able to create more children to murder. Madness.
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 25rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I saw this today. I have no words. A newborn baby’s life is worth nothing .
This one should be strung up or if we cant have that then never let out.

I doubt they will even castrate him to stop the savage breeding again.

Horrific and no, the sentence does not reflect that.
Unbelievable. From the link, totally deliberate as well. Not a tragic accident. Shocking.
Perhaps his fellow inmates will be able to do what the judge couldn't...
He'll probably be on the NONCE wing Jim, so unless a door gets forgotten to be locked ....
He was convicted of culpable homicide & serious assault, not murder.

However, IMO it was essentially murder & the sentence should have reflected that & been considerably longer.
He'll definitely be "doing the numbers", though even in segregation there is a hierarchy of offence and, if he's sent to a large prison like Barlinnie, he'll be "segregated" with dozens, maybe hundreds, of other inmates, so fingers crossed!
LiK, I presume there was a reason that the charge of murder, and another of attempted murder, were not proceeded with. I have no idea what they were, as I don't know anything about Scottish law.

I do suspect, though, that in Scotland as in England murder involves intent and the defendant did not intend to kill the child.
I'm guessing that the prosecution could not prove intent, which is neecessary for a charge of murder.Under culpable homicide the maximum penalty is life imprisonment which this low-life should received.
///it was essentially murder & the sentence should have reflected that & been considerably longer.////

Absolutely. What are the CPS up to ?
Of course he should be charged with murder. Why would you inflict such force on a baby if you didn't intend to murder it?
Stupid laws and stupid sentencing.
Question Author
YMB: "He'll probably be on the NONCE wing Jim, so unless a door gets forgotten to be locked ...." - some of those prison officers can be very careless leaving doors open and nonces alone on the landing etc.
Come on - by his own admission he hit and violently shook his seven-week old child to such an extent that it suffered a skull fracture, a bleed to the brain, a serious brain injury and fractured ribs, leading to its death in hospital two days later.

Nobody in their right mind can seriously find any mitigating circumstances here. Who gives a toss if his intention was not to actually kill the child. If the prosecution couldn't actually prove intent to kill, then the sentence should definitely have been a full life term.
That was to jno.
Canary, as far as I know the CPS's writ does not extend to Ayrshire.
JimF

Who gives a toss if his intention was not to actually kill the child

The law does.
And the maximum sentence he could / should have received is life. 12 years is an insult.
That’s the whole problem. The judiciary. I don’t always admire ‘ things’ about USA but, I do wonder what sentence this person would have had in an American court ?
anne, does "12 years" mean potentially out in 6 as it seems to in England?

1 to 20 of 25rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

12 Years, Seriously?

Answer Question >>