Labour And Palastine...........

[ToraToraTora]

https://labourandpalestine.org.uk/
Can't seem to find the labour and Israel site!

[royfromaus]

You're still defending anti-semitism then, Gromit.

[naomi24]

Sunk, //Naz Shah‘s crime was to repost a tweet from an Israeli author. The original tweet did not say Israel should be moved to the USA, it was an observation that it would have been safer for Israel rather than being plonked surrounded by Arab states.//

That’s a very curious thing for any Jew to say - very curious indeed because it makes no sense. Who is this Israeli author?

[Sunk]

Naomi - See here.

https://www.theanswerbank.co.uk/News/Question1490174.html

[Sunk]

Roy
// You're still defending anti-semitism then, Gromit. //

Nope.
Objecting to Israel’s military adventures is not anti-semitic.

[royfromaus]

Naz Shah has proved time and time again what she is and you keep defending her.

[naomi24]

Sunk, the author regarded the suggestion as a joke then - which renders Naz Shah even more ignorant.

[Sunk]

// Naz Shah has proved time and time again what she is and you keep defending her. //

She has never been prosecuted for anti-semitisim, she is still an MP. She has not been proved anything.
Reposting a Tweet from a Jewish writer, Norman Finkelstein, does not make her anti-semitic, quite the opposite.

[Sunk]

naomi24

Of course it was a joke. It sounds like you are the ignorant one for treating the post as a serious suggestion.
You really thought moving Israel to the mid west of the United States was a real proposal ?

[naomi24]

Not me - but Naz Shah did.

[Sunk]

// Not me. But Naz Shah did //

No she didn’t. Her comment was also a weak joke about saving bank charges.

http://cdn.timesofisrael.com/uploads/2016/04/nazshah.jpg

[naomi24]

Some joke! Oh how she laughed when she was suspended for it. Read your own link and stop trying to defend the indefensible. The woman is an ignorant fool.

[Sunk]

Naomi,
There is no anti-semitism in the graphic. There was no anti-semitism in her accompanying comment. It is easily defendable because there was no offense at all!

[Spicerack]

Didn't she like and retweet a 'final solution' tweet aimed at Jews?

[naomi24]

That'll be why she was suspended then. To a Jew that would be highly offensive. In fact unforgivably offensive. You see what you want to see.

[Spicerack]

She was the one who liked and retweeted the 'rape victims should shut their mouths for the sake of diversity'.
She's obviously misunderstood, sunk.

[Spicerack]

To be fair, Shah wasn't Labour's pick for MP.
The local Muslims demanded their own candidate, so Labour sacked the candidate they had chosen and put Shah up instead.
Ah, the joys of vote rigging.

[carolegif]

Apparently Jeremy Corbin was at a Pro Palestinian Talley at the weekend standing next to a inflatable showing a parody Jewish banker with horns etc. didn’t see that on BBC News!

[royfromaus]

Sunk
// Naz Shah has proved time and time again what she is and you keep defending her. //

She has never been prosecuted for anti-semitisim, she is still an MP. She has not been proved anything.
Reposting a Tweet from a Jewish writer, Norman Finkelstein, does not make her anti-semitic, quite the opposite.
______________________________

What about her admission that what she said was antisemitic?

[Sunk]

Roy,
The Tweet was 7 years ago.
I remember her apologising but for causing offence, but I also remember she did not admit her words were anti-semitic and she did not apologise for anti-semitism.

Her apology is here:
https://jewishnews.timesofisrael.com/naz-shah-my-apology-to-the-jewish-community/

[royfromaus]

Sunk
Roy,
The Tweet was 7 years ago.
I remember her apologising but for causing offence, but I also remember she did not admit her words were anti-semitic and she did not apologise for anti-semitism.
_____________________________________
You do know I take what you say with a pinch of salt, Sunk?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-36802075