P M Qs..... The Understudies.... Usual...
News1 min ago
Chauvin's History
I don't think I've seen anything further about him here. But it was interesting that on AB, the past of the victim seemed more important than the past of the perpetrator..
With 18 complaints plus disciplinaries for violent behaviour behind him.... has anyone changed their mind (or willing to admit) that if you give a violent control freak too much power, they will abuse it?
https:/
With 18 complaints plus disciplinaries for violent behaviour behind him.... has anyone changed their mind (or willing to admit) that if you give a violent control freak too much power, they will abuse it?
https:/
Answers
I maintain my earlier point, a handcuffed man cannot easily get to his feet, much less start causing trouble - as much trouble as you can cause without use of your hands - without being easily restrained. Had Mr Floyd managed to get up - and give it a try, just lie down, lace your fingers together behind your back and see how easy it isn't to get to your feet - any one of...
16:29 Fri 30th Apr 2021
-- answer removed --
In all these things you usually take the case on its facts
there is now bad character evidence which is allowed in english law under strict cricumstances
thre is also the similar evidence rule where you make up evidence because he did exactly that 2 y ago and so .....
In the Ebola GMC case - I was told - oh they will have to find the doctor guilty of spreading ebola because they did that to the nurse and it wouldnt be fair to screw one and not the other
and I said - excuse me what did you just say?
and yes Paul Cosford of the PHE you knew neither were guilty because it was one of your employees wasnt it? this came out in the oral testimony under oath at the GMC
there is now bad character evidence which is allowed in english law under strict cricumstances
thre is also the similar evidence rule where you make up evidence because he did exactly that 2 y ago and so .....
In the Ebola GMC case - I was told - oh they will have to find the doctor guilty of spreading ebola because they did that to the nurse and it wouldnt be fair to screw one and not the other
and I said - excuse me what did you just say?
and yes Paul Cosford of the PHE you knew neither were guilty because it was one of your employees wasnt it? this came out in the oral testimony under oath at the GMC
Thanks all. Anne, I did know, but not many specifics beforehand, let alone that he had done exactly the same thing previously on a child.
Tbh, I don't expect anyone to
even admit they changed their minds on here. I was just interested in how people judged character really.
You can find it from whichever source you like, zacs now, but this is one
https:/
And thanks, spice- didn't help that most of the world actually saw him do it. No.
Tbh, I don't expect anyone to
even admit they changed their minds on here. I was just interested in how people judged character really.
You can find it from whichever source you like, zacs now, but this is one
https:/
And thanks, spice- didn't help that most of the world actually saw him do it. No.
'he had done exactly the same thing previously on a child'
Well, not exactly. The child didn't die which a decent Barrister may have argued enhanced the argument that Floyd's drug habit may have contributed to his death.
As someone else has already stated, the Guilty verdict was a foregone conclusion.
Well, not exactly. The child didn't die which a decent Barrister may have argued enhanced the argument that Floyd's drug habit may have contributed to his death.
As someone else has already stated, the Guilty verdict was a foregone conclusion.
I said 'No' for exactly the same reason. You can opine that one thing leads to the other but you have a) no proof Chauvin was a violent control freak' or b)that giving one (a VCF) too much power they will abuse it.
Again, they are merely your unprovable conclusions in an effort to prove you were right.
Again, they are merely your unprovable conclusions in an effort to prove you were right.
Dixon of Dock Green's already in jail for belonging to a neo-Nazi terror group
https:/
https:/
Pretty sure you can't bring a defendant's past history into play in any trial, girls, keen as you are/were to do so.
On the other hand, George's previous drug use, interaction with the police, etc were crucial to the trial.
So while you'd like to think that anyone who didn't want Chauvin lynched must be institutionally racist. Some of us just like to see fair play.
On the other hand, George's previous drug use, interaction with the police, etc were crucial to the trial.
So while you'd like to think that anyone who didn't want Chauvin lynched must be institutionally racist. Some of us just like to see fair play.
