Sweetcorn In A Bag Of Mixed Veg
Food & Drink0 min ago
Want To Pick Up Your Phone Whilst Driving......?
30 Answers
https:/
YOU MUST RESIST!
YOU MUST RESIST!
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Just for a bit of clarity (because the Press never make things like this very clear) it has always been illegal to use a mobile phone whilst driving (well, since the specific legislation was introduced). However, the law says specifically (and solely) that you must not use it for "interactive communication." Mr Ramsey Barreto had been convicted under that legislation in the Magistrates' Court. His argument that it was his son, not him who was using the phone was rejected. He appealed to the Crown Court and his lawyer drew attention to the fact that the phone was not being used for "interactive communication" but was being used to film the scene of a traffic accident. He cited an earlier Crown Court case where the defendant had been acquitted because he showed that he was using the phone to listen to music. Mr Barreto's conviction was quashed.
The prosecution, fearful of "floodgates" opening, took the matter to the High Court by way of a "Case Stated." The Justices at the High Court upheld the Crown Court's decision, saying that the legislation was quite clear in that it only prevented using a phone whilst driving if it was being used for "interactive communication" and that taking photographs or a film did not fall into that definition.
Since then, if a mobile phone charge is challenged, it has been incumbent on the prosecution to prove that the phone was being used for communication, hence the proposed change of law. Here's the judgement in Mr. Barreto's case:
https:/
The prosecution, fearful of "floodgates" opening, took the matter to the High Court by way of a "Case Stated." The Justices at the High Court upheld the Crown Court's decision, saying that the legislation was quite clear in that it only prevented using a phone whilst driving if it was being used for "interactive communication" and that taking photographs or a film did not fall into that definition.
Since then, if a mobile phone charge is challenged, it has been incumbent on the prosecution to prove that the phone was being used for communication, hence the proposed change of law. Here's the judgement in Mr. Barreto's case:
https:/
bazil: "So , there is no law currently against picking up a mobile phone and not using it - nor is it to be under this new legislation
Is that correct ? " - read the judge above, currently the law only applies to interactive communication. Thus you can play games or take pictures and that has been tested in court, hence the law change.
Is that correct ? " - read the judge above, currently the law only applies to interactive communication. Thus you can play games or take pictures and that has been tested in court, hence the law change.
not sure, Baz, I've been reading press reports and it's unclear. The Times says even touching your phone will be illegal; the BBC says "picking up and using it"; the Guardian says "using" it. (Apparently you'll still be able to use it to pay for a Big Mac at a drive-through.)
It sounds as though the media have just been reporting leaks and have interpreted them differently; we may have to see exactly what the official announcements say - I haven't seen any yet.
It sounds as though the media have just been reporting leaks and have interpreted them differently; we may have to see exactly what the official announcements say - I haven't seen any yet.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.