Donate SIGN UP

They Can’T Have It All Ways !

Avatar Image
Bobbisox1 | 09:18 Wed 19th Feb 2020 | News
67 Answers
https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1244189/meghan-markle-news-sussex-royal-brand-ban-prince-harry-the-queen-royal-latest

He opted to go it alone with his wife and rebrand themselves , the Queen has rightly so said they will not be allowed the word Royal in their venture
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 67rss feed

1 2 3 4 Next Last

Avatar Image
Anne, I would hate their job. My point is Wills and Kate would be away from their family too much, up and down the country, tours abroad. Why take a young couple away from their young family more than they already are? I know you hate the RF but come on, surely you can't disagree with what I'm saying? Let Charles do it, he's been waiting long enough;-)
12:24 Wed 19th Feb 2020
quite right, i guess there must be some bad feelings over this, but they just have to get on with it...
Question Author
They made their bed etc
,
We’re happy with our Queen,William and Kate now
Charles first, then W & K
I wonder if that’s why “Royale Park” in Park Royal (oops) is so named. Is there a ban on using the word Royal in trade names, places etc?
This is something that’s been talked about for months.
Question Author
I think most places inc parks and hotels would be by Royal approval ich?
Would they?
Question Author
Emmie I tend to overlook Charles a bit as I hope it’s William and Kate that take the throne when Queen Elizabeth dies
Come to think of it it’s probably so named to avoid confusion with any of the royal parks
you can't buck the system, it's Charles next, unless he passes away before hand. He looks in rude health so can't see that happening..
Question Author
I Dong know ich but I suspect it’s because Harry’s birthright is Royal and she doesn’t want that in the title of any venture they brand, he opted out of all things Royal and HM was deeply hurt buy this
Question Author
*dont*
Question Author
Yes I guess so , it’s not that I don’t like Charles, I do but a younger couple on the throne would be better, I don’t even dislike Camilla and think she’s been vilified but has proven to be a quietly confident lady
Good for her, and while she's at it, she should take away their HRH and make sure they pay for their own security. They want it both ways those two.
Question Author
Morning HereIam,I agree
That has to be some of the weakest drivel yet from journalists.

You might even be forgiven for thinking it was made up on the hoof.
Is this just another thread to berate the couple? From your link; "The Sussexes are understood to have accepted..............". Surely all they need do is to add an 'e' to the end of the word 'Royal'. SussexRoyale sounds a tad classier anyway. In my most humble opinion, of course:-/
Hi Bobbs. I too would like William to be our next King, but Charles won't be overlooked. Although I'd love to know how old he's going to be before he takes over as the Queen seems to be in great health, thankfully.
Question Author
Morning Douglas I deliberately went for the Express headlines, the best of the worst if you like
Question Author
If she follows her own mothers longevity, she’ll reign for another 7/8 years HereIam
I was reading somewhere that one of the Labour talking head nincompoops was saying that she would abolish the Monarchy but would like to see a Queen Meghan. Think it was Lisa Nandy. There goes another name that does what it says on the tin.

1 to 20 of 67rss feed

1 2 3 4 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

They Can’T Have It All Ways !

Answer Question >>