SIGN UP

Answers

181 to 200 of 200rss feed

First Previous 7 8 9 10

Avatar Image
Sicerack //There are 40,000 of these creatures on Jihad watch and it takes 20+ officers to watch one of them.// The idea that in order to protect society (the first duty of any government) we have to have more & more police surveillance of potential Jihadis is misguided 'top-down' thinking. We have to attack the root causes. These attacks have a religious...
09:25 Mon 03rd Feb 2020
sevenOP - // Libaas clowns more likely ( Lashkari Henry ) //

I don't know who that is, if indeed it is a person - ?

Google is no help - can you elaborate for me please?
That's good then, Bobbi xx naomi and I often agree or disagree, depending on the subject. But, as with anyone on AB, I have every respect for her, anyway.
Question Author
Yes I’m sure it’s reciprocated Pixie :0)
Who knows lol... but that isn't the point for me, anyway xx
Question Author
Well I’m off to bed to read my Kindle and keep out of trouble haha, night night Pixie et al
To be clear - I have respect of naomi;s obvious intelligence, and her knowledge, and her ability to argue her point and stick to it.

It's her occasional superior attitude I have trouble with, and I call her out on it every time.

Similarly, she perceives me as ignorant of matters Islamic, and is equally able to exercise her right of criticism, which I equally accept.

That's how debate works - she appears fine with it, I absolutely am, so there is really no need for anyone to start getting het up when the debate warms up a little.

Passionate opinions run high, but no-one is harmed in the making of these exchanges.

Promise!
Goodnight Bobbi, sleep well.

(You don't have to answer!!!)

xx.
Night, bobbi :-) xxx
andy-h,

Libaas is Lashkari/Urdu for costume... the Legal facade (Hooray-Hs) that, awwwh!!, were powerless to 'prevent' the release of a deranged madman ( tautology again [;¬ # ) from a high security prison.... Nothing to see here, Assange on...
Now you’ve all got off your chests whatever was on your chests just to say that you are more than welcome to check out anything I say on this subject. I do not speculate - it is all there for anyone who would would rather learn than rant.

Thank you Bobbi.

Night all.
naomi
Apparently he doesn't rant and he does not like superior attitudes. :-)
Immediately after this incident happens the do-gooders are saying prison does not work ( Khan, Amnesty International et al) as prisoners will become radicalised in gaol. How does that square with the evidence that this piece of scum was planning terrorist attacks long before he ever saw the inside of a prison cell? Prior to his 3 year sentence (reduced) he was communicating with a Dutch blogger. That man said that Amman was a very dangerous man at that time.
Amman was sending Whatsapp photos to his own family including younger siblings and exposing them to graphic Terrorist material.He had discussed with his family, friends and girlfriend his strong and often extreme views on jihad, the kuffar, and his desire to carry out a terrorist attack.
If his god fearing innocent family were made aware,by him, of his allegiance to Terrorist organisations and his extreme wishes to kill non- believers surely it is their duty as good law abiding citizens to report these activities to the appropriate authorities. He told his girl friend to behead her parents as they were non believers.
After he was shot his mother said he was a nice boy.!
This scum has got his martyrdom at the cost of two people badly injured and many traumatised at what they witnessed. The mother,and family are just as guilty for keeping silent about his activities. If,as I would guess, his mother was not born in this country I think that due consideration be considered in investigating how much more she was aware of and charged with withholding information or aiding/abetting the crimes committed. If guilty then deportation to follow. Possibly our law abiding peaceful religious adherents may be more forthcoming with regard to further information on our wannabe jihadists if the threat of deportation for non disclosure is proved.


Letting him out halfway through his sentence when he had clearly voiced his intentions is the biggest problem , thank goodness there is to be a tightening up of that.
For an ex-cop retrocop, you seem to have fully taken on board hearsay evidence and should fully understand what abetting means.
You seem to have missed the words’ if proved’ after investigation.
How to prevent further radicalization in jail- if you are convicted of terrorist linked crimes you spend your entire sentence in solitary.

You're welcome.
Spending their entire lives in prison would be a better idea. Mozz. A guarantee they won't re-offend.
No " if proved" here retrocop:

//Prior to his 3 year sentence (reduced) he was communicating with a Dutch blogger. That man said that Amman was a very dangerous man at that time.
Amman was sending Whatsapp photos to his own family including younger siblings and exposing them to graphic Terrorist material.He had discussed with his family, friends and girlfriend his strong and often extreme views on jihad, the kuffar, and his desire to carry out a terrorist attack. //
Vindicated, retrocop. (I think most of us believed you anyway). :)

181 to 200 of 200rss feed

First Previous 7 8 9 10

Do you know the answer?

Breaking News , Terrorist Related In South London

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.