Donate SIGN UP

Answers

21 to 40 of 47rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
^therefore the greater threat by quite a long way comes from Islamic terrorists.
Do you suppose that plod and the Gridiron have started classifying Muslims as far right Naomi, without telling us? Think about it..... they are .....and they all vote Labour. Talk about a crock of whatsit.
Question Author
/// A third of all terror plots to kill in Britain since 2017 – seven out of 22 were by those driven by extreme-right causes." ///

That makes 15 driven by other extreme causes and they weren't just plots to kill, but killings on a wide scale.
I believe we should be more vigilant and concerned, these bstards get me wondering why we don't have stiffer whole life tariffs for terrorists.
Just be quite you sheeple and die, for we will get to you eventually, unless you convert.
ANOTHEOLDGIT, do you have the details of the fifteen terror plots showing they were plots to kill on a wide scale?
Quiet.....autocorrect again....
The establishment refuses to address the real problems that this country faces?
Take Tommy Robinson, Nigel Farage and co.

according to well everyone on AB - Tommy and the Nige are solutions and not problems, innit ?
The only attacks we hear about are the ones which have been perpetrated. We will never know how many have been thwarted.
Togo. //Do you suppose that plod and the Gridiron have started classifying Muslims as far right Naomi//

Could be. Maybe they've taken a few lessons on Islam.... and seen the light, Togo. ;o)
THECORBYLOON, //ANOTHEOLDGIT, do you have the details of the fifteen terror plots showing they were plots to kill on a wide scale?//

Would it be more acceptable if they were plots to kill on a narrower scale?
//Would it be more acceptable if they were plots to kill on a narrower scale?//

er no it would be more acceptable if we had more details - like if they existed or not

it is the usual thing about state secrecy is used to cover up cack ups and incompetence rather than reserve state secrets.

Arena inquests - which I dont expect you to know about, some documents were SO secret they couldnt be shown. (coz they were secret see?). Now the judge has demanded to see them - two years later - some documents ( police chatter on the night) were never transcribed and have been lost.

oo-er Mrs ! how can you tell if a politician is lying? .....

and dont forget the lawyers on this site about the 30 y saga of Hillsborough maintain the view that due process has always been followed and the system really is meant to work like this !

( my arriss)

PP, try to keep up, there's a good chap.
//Arena inquests - which I dont expect you to know about, some documents were SO secret they couldnt be shown. (coz they were secret see?). Now the judge has demanded to see them - two years later - some documents ( police chatter on the night) were never transcribed and have been lost.//

Like the poor demented author of above would like you to believe he is actually privy to all this information and us mere plebs will never hold that privilege he is attempting to impress us with. Usual B.S.
Maybe he knows somebody, who knows somebody, who overheard something, from the same source that said something else that was true, according to somebody else.
Yes Theland. If he doesn't know the answer he will prattle on totally off topic on another subject and pretend there is a link that ties up. We are all,of course, too stupid to understand what his demented ramblings are about. I suppose it keeps him smug and self satisfied. When he spouts the oracle I suppose we can just say,wat dat den, and just another day on Answerbank. :-)
P.P. //according to well everyone on AB - Tommy and the Nige are solutions and not problems, innit ?//

The implication there seems to be that these two are "problems", if you think that is true, why?
The terminology is puzzling.
What is more right wing than Jihadi Islamofascism?
"Would it be more acceptable if they were plots to kill on a narrower scale?"

That is a stupid question to ask, since no terrorist plot is acceptable.

The terrorists need only instill fear in folk to have an impact and ANOTHEOLDGIT is increasing that fear by exaggerating the potential outcomes of the foiled plots.




In my opinion, what the security / authority / political narrative is describing as right wing is simply a reaction to the genuinely relight wing Islamofascist terrorism we suffer.

21 to 40 of 47rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Should We Be More Concerned Over Islamic Terrorism?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.