ChatterBank0 min ago
Carl Beech Jailed For 18 Years.
https:/
Good.
What a piece of filth.
The devastation he has caused to other people's live's must be immeasurable.
Good.
What a piece of filth.
The devastation he has caused to other people's live's must be immeasurable.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Bigbad. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
The only word I can come up with to describe this person is scum.
https:/
I heard the Harvey Proctor interview the day this scum was arrested, and his pain was palpable; the poor man was in tears, his reputation had been ruined as were his finances.
I can't help thinking that part of the fault is that from 2014 there has been a presumption that 'victims' are telling the truth.
https:/
I heard the Harvey Proctor interview the day this scum was arrested, and his pain was palpable; the poor man was in tears, his reputation had been ruined as were his finances.
I can't help thinking that part of the fault is that from 2014 there has been a presumption that 'victims' are telling the truth.
Operation Midland involved 30 Officers over 18 months and cost £2.5 Million pounds. It called Beech’s evidence ‘credible and true’.
From what we now, it seems incredible that Beech’s story didn’t unravel more quickly, and that he was taken seriously for so long. Beech is an evil liar, but the people who should have found him out earlier were very negligent. And Hogan-Howes got a Knighthood and sits in the Lords, and the man in Operation charge of Operation Midland, quietly retired from the Met last week, with out any disciplinary action against him.
https:/
From what we now, it seems incredible that Beech’s story didn’t unravel more quickly, and that he was taken seriously for so long. Beech is an evil liar, but the people who should have found him out earlier were very negligent. And Hogan-Howes got a Knighthood and sits in the Lords, and the man in Operation charge of Operation Midland, quietly retired from the Met last week, with out any disciplinary action against him.
https:/
// I can't help thinking that part of the fault is that from 2014 there has been a presumption that 'victims' are telling the truth. //
because there was - Allison Saunders DPP brought that change in altho I think she was told it would be disastrous and did it anyway
"you will be believed"
now downgraded to you will be taken seriously
and if the complainant is believed then the lucky suspect has to disprove the allegations
Yes I have been on the end of this and didnt like it much. Oh you are oK you arent famous, i was told solicitously
this is rare by the way, usually they say "o the allegations arent true, well your prize is that you have shown yourself innocent."
because there was - Allison Saunders DPP brought that change in altho I think she was told it would be disastrous and did it anyway
"you will be believed"
now downgraded to you will be taken seriously
and if the complainant is believed then the lucky suspect has to disprove the allegations
Yes I have been on the end of this and didnt like it much. Oh you are oK you arent famous, i was told solicitously
this is rare by the way, usually they say "o the allegations arent true, well your prize is that you have shown yourself innocent."
//I find it incredibly concerning that it flies in the face of presumed innocence until proven otherwise.//
With cases such as this one (and many others) the police and CPS seem recently to have turned justice on its head. They assume that people such as this creature are telling the truth when anybody with half a brain could have seen that he was a liar and a fantasist and, more than that, waas almost certainly driven by the thought of large amounts of "compo" that might come his way. The Met police stated, without ny foundation whatsoever, that his allegations were "credible and true". Just how they could have arrived at that conclusion is anybody's guess and I would have thought, particularly in view of the people accused by Beech, that a few enquiries would have been made before that statement was issued. In fact, it should not have been made at all lest it jeopardised any court cases that might follow. There is a well known principle among police detectives: "A", "B", "C". Assume nothing; Believe nobody; Check everything. It seems the detectives involved in this case did not learn their alphabet.
With cases such as this one (and many others) the police and CPS seem recently to have turned justice on its head. They assume that people such as this creature are telling the truth when anybody with half a brain could have seen that he was a liar and a fantasist and, more than that, waas almost certainly driven by the thought of large amounts of "compo" that might come his way. The Met police stated, without ny foundation whatsoever, that his allegations were "credible and true". Just how they could have arrived at that conclusion is anybody's guess and I would have thought, particularly in view of the people accused by Beech, that a few enquiries would have been made before that statement was issued. In fact, it should not have been made at all lest it jeopardised any court cases that might follow. There is a well known principle among police detectives: "A", "B", "C". Assume nothing; Believe nobody; Check everything. It seems the detectives involved in this case did not learn their alphabet.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.