Donate SIGN UP

Answers

21 to 40 of 91rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last

Avatar Image
The double standard (fed largely by malice and ignorance, I suggest) which applauds this prosecution is extraordinary. Of course, Robinson as a marked man under a provisional sentence for contempt of court was quite needlessly and, you might think, provocatively standing outside a court a year later live-streaming stuff. Despite that you might ask why...
00:53 Sun 07th Jul 2019
I find it amazing that some ABers are willing to have the prosecutions of child abusers and rapists jeopardised by an individual who believes that he is acting as a 'warrior for justice'.

Why don't they want these rapists and child abusers prosecuted to the full letter of the law?
Because they’d rather perpetuate their blinkered view of the world where they believe justice is a simple process and right wing thugs are right to get involved. They believe that because you criticise knuckle drafters like Robinson, you stand up for rape gangs. It’s a sad indictment on the nations intelligence.
//It takes someone incredibly stupid to then go out and commit the very same offence again//

I think we're all agreed there, Gromit.

The other issue (if it's of any importance to you, and if you understand the moral implications - and both may be elusive) is whether raping a twelve year old girl or complaining about it constitutes the greater sin.

It is possible you don't understand the point I'm trying to make. If so, please advise and I'll try to simplify.
Is that guy a moderator on this site? How do they go about selecting them? Is it some kind od race to the bottom?
Which guy?
If it is V-, say hi to them when they get there.
Oh, God. The Jack the Hats and the Zac's Masters have turned up posing as defenders of vulnerable girls and dissembling their actual stance. Which is to protect the rapists.
How do you equate a right wing thug interrupting the legal process with supporting rape gangs? You’d have to be a complete moron to make that equate to supporting rape gangs. For the record, rape gangs are abhorrent and deserve the full punishment of the law.
Quite, zacs.
It's a peculiar leap of logic to believe that annoyance at a Right-wing agitator potentially destroying a case against child rapists and abusers somehow shows sympathy for/with those very same child rapists and abusers.
Unless, of course, you have great antipathy towards the poster of those comments in the first place which causes you to want to misunderstand what they have said and take them to task for it.... :o)
Quite so.
Let’s take little peak at Y-L’s CV, shall we. And let’s bear in mind some on here think this ‘person’ is fit to interrupt due process and uphold him as some sort of people’s champion:

He pleaded guilty at to using someone else's passport to gain entry to the United States. He had been previously banned from entering the US due to a drugs offence.
He was convicted of three counts of conspiracy to commit fraud by misrepresentation relating to a mortgage application. The fraud apparently amounted to £160,000 over a period of six months, so no small beer.
He was convicted of using threatening, abusive or insulting behaviour, for leading a group of Luton Town F.C. supporters into a brawl involving 100 people.
Being sentenced to 13 months' imprisonment for which also included activation of an earlier three-month suspended sentence for a similar contempt of court at Canterbury.
He was convicted of assaulting an off-duty police officer in a drunken argument. This resulted in him losing his job.
He was convicted in 2011 of using "threatening, abusive or insulting behaviour" during a fight between supporters of Luton Town and Newport County.
He was arrested after an EDL demonstration in Tower Hamlets in September 2011 for breach of bail conditions.
He was convicted of common assault after headbutting a fellow EDL member at a rally in Blackburn.
He received a suspended sentence for putting a trial at Canterbury Crown Court at risk of collapse, by broadcasting prejudicial statements about defendants from inside the court building.
(You'd have to ask yourself how they got away with it for so long. What with so many Zac's Masters being against it and standing up for the girls. Maybe ZM was busy trolling on social media.)
VE, what would your reaction have been if any of Tommy Robinson's actions prevented a continuing or future trial from being possible?
I think you’ve just proven my ‘moron’ point V-E.
Ah, Corbyloon and Zac's Master combine in a single function. It requires only one term in the equation to be zero in order to produce zero. Need I say more?
VE, 5 + 0 = 5 so your maths is as good as your argument.
(Had multiplication in mind)
A tribute to Mikey, a cloth cap bigot whom I didn't particularly like, but was essentially honest by his own standards. Unlike the low-level trolls I've just engaged with:

When you run out of coherent English there’s always the word ‘trolls’ to fall back on I suppose.
Should I refer to Roget or the vernacular for alternatives? The latter is more concise.

21 to 40 of 91rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Tommy Robinson Found Guilty.

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.