SIGN UP

Ban The Unvaccinated From Public.

Avatar Image
spathiphyllum | 12:35 Thu 04th Apr 2019 | News
112 Answers
Thank god. The state finally implementing some restrictions for these unfortunate kids with thick as muck parents.

https://news.vice.com/en_us/article/7xngvg/kentucky-judge-rules-against-unvaccinated-student-who-was-banned-from-school?utm_source=vicefbus&fbclid=IwAR0bY9iTVI9fhdt9vakM12lLQJafKi426tzYSx941SLbXYCjeTMaSjqmu18

Yes this is in Kentucky but don't fry me, chicken.

Answers

101 to 112 of 112rss feed

First Previous 3 4 5 6

Avatar Image
Leaving aside the rarer medical reasons for non vaccination for a moment - the anti-vaxxers are doing a ot of damage with their dcare mongering an of course with the internet it has spread far beyond the USA. This young man is claiming his religion is against it whilst the Church in fact isn't. Elsewhere the resurgence of the link to autism (unproven) of certain...
13:04 Thu 04th Apr 2019
Spath, you seem to not grasp the difference between a bee sting for someone who ins't allergic ( painful and unpleasant) and a bee sting for someone who is ( anaphylaxis and possibly death). It's the same with any allergy, you don't just pop and couple of Piriton if you have anaphylaxis, you have an Epi Pen which delivers adrenaline to give you a fighting chance to get to a hospital before you die.
Question Author
I know that, but for all i know i could well have an anaphylaxis reaction because i've never experienced a bee sting, or can you not only be highly allergic to just a bee sting?

as far as i'm currently aware i'm not allergic to anything
Spath hen I said you shouldn't believe everything you read on the internet I meant you personally not other people.
You can be highly allergic to virtually anything, peanuts, animal allergens, stings, chemicals, anything.
Spath, many immigrants reject vaccination both here and in their own countries. Go and do some research. Denial doesn’t help solve problems.
Banning the public because they exercised their right not to be injected ? What sort of State does that ? One not dedicated to freedom that's for sure.
Not sure some of the arguments (sorry discussions) on here hold water. Surely it is down to parents whether or not they have their children vaccinated. It doesn't mean they are "thick as muck". Perhaps they have researched the pros and cons and decided against.
exactly Maggie
// Banning the public because they exercised their right not to be injected ? What sort of State does that ?//

the whole of public health law is based on population Y is singled out because of their relation to disease X

smallpox, TB, measles stand out before even wondering about Cholera ....

and yes I am afraid that some vax programs are to protect children too young to be vaccinated by vaccinating the older kids so the disease does not take a hold

whooping cough and measles spring to mind - the deaths are in under ones ....
// Surely it is down to parents whether or not they have their children vaccinated.//

listen to some of the arguments and yes reassure yourself they are really are as thick as muck.

as for parental choice --- o you have parental choice over paying taxes or registering their births do you?
as free tee used to quip - righto!
PP I am sure that some are...equally I am sure that some are not.
Question Author
i trust science over parents googling things on the internet. The except are cases like RR

101 to 112 of 112rss feed

First Previous 3 4 5 6

Do you know the answer?

Ban The Unvaccinated From Public.

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.