Donate SIGN UP

People's Vote?

Avatar Image
mushroom25 | 19:25 Mon 25th Feb 2019 | News
122 Answers
lots of chatter on here (and elsewhere) for a "people's vote" - a second referendum, it's also been described as. well now Mr Corbyn is looking to get behind the campaign:-
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-47363307

with both parties polarised by Brexit, what chance of the "people's vote" receiving a parliamentary majority? and, more importantly, what would the question be - a simple yes/no choice, or more options to choose from?

ignore, for now, the charge that a second vote cold be "undemocratic".....
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 122rss feed

1 2 3 4 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by mushroom25. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Corbyn is looking to get behind the campaign ? Good. That should kill the nonsense off for good, then.
we had a peoples vote.
It's been a long time coming. However we aren't there yet (by all of which I mean Corbyn supporting one, not it actually happening).
Labour's support is conditional on the Labour amendment getting through on Wednesday, although I think that seems unlikely to succeed.
I think that if the May deal is rejected and No Deal is off the agenda (neither of which scenarios can be predicted at the moment) then there's probably little other option and in that case I think parliament would vote for it. It wouldn't need a huge number of Tory MPs backing it, assuming Labour finally got behind it.
The most likely scenario leading to a people's vote is probably if the Kyle amendment gets passed: that promises to back the PM's deal subject to it being put to a referendum.
As for the options, that is very tricky: there is no agreement on what the options should be: probably 2 or 3 out of "deal/no deal/remain.
I have to say I think it would be very unlikely that "no deal AND deal" would be on there, because you'd have two Brexit options, splitting the Brexit vote: can you imagine the fuss if "remain" was the most popular option but "deal/no deal" combined outpolled it.
It would have to be two options really, and it doesn't, it seems to me, make sense to have people voting on a negative: there would have to be some sort of deal to vote for. So: "deal v remain"

"ignore, for now, the charge that a second vote cold be "undemocratic"....."

Good luck with that :-)


It's all getting like Eurovision...

Two lots of voting and very political o:(
In such a fantasy new referendum 'Remain' couldn't be an option because that's already been decided. It'd be a choice between being forever in thrall to the EU with May's jest, or just leaving because a proper exit deal is being thwarted and we can't hang around forever dancing to the EU's tune.
second vote - second vote marm?

if you read AB and all the musings of the usual suspects and thickos you see that they shouldnt have been allowed a first one !
Lol; OG’s going to be setting the question :-)

Seriously there would be a deal of some sort to vote on: might not be May’s deal, who knows. Anything else would be close to a rerun of the first one and no one wants that do they? ;-)

I honestly don’t know how likely another referendum is and my prediction of the options is only a best guess.
If remain won a second referendum why can't we have a third to make it best of three? Or would it be a question of ignore the first because we didn't get the right answer?
Best of three, vocal remainers get to bray, catcall and trumpet over more reasonable voices for a couple of years and the whole thing dies of apathy, old age and an outbreak of common sense before the third one can be organised.

A cross spectrum delegation then marches on Brussels and upends the troughs sending the self regarding scampering for the hills and we all pop flowers in the barrels of all and any guns.
good ole two pee, knew you let us down me ole china!
Apparently 87% of people who achieved voting age since 2016 would vote to remain.
As for “best of three” well why not, although the second one in all likelihood would be different to the first so it wouldn’t really be best of three.
I wonder how you’d word the question in a referendum where there was a deal AND a no deal option?
Lots of issues to be resolved should it come to it.
you all must be fick if ya daant agree with the interlecalls like 2p or not 2p.
We have already had a people's vote, what's the point of another one if the people can't have what they vote for?
It does seem that the main proponents for another referendum are remainers.

That’s why remain shouldn’t be on the ballot paper. That and the fact we have had an in or out vote. It might be a bit of a surprise for some but the result of the first in or out referendum was out.
because the losers aren't happy 1581960!
"Peoples Vote "- Second referendum . Bring it on, can't wait.
should be a bit of excitement in the village gulliver!
It was a 'people's vote' that created this mess in the first place.
TTT, prior to the referendum, your hero, Nigel Farage, said, "In a 52-48 referendum this would be unfinished business by a long way. " Was he wrong?
No Zebo it was remainextremists in parliment that brought about this mess.

1 to 20 of 122rss feed

1 2 3 4 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

People's Vote?

Answer Question >>