Donate SIGN UP

Answers

1 to 20 of 25rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.

Gosh, I am so pleased to read your thread title,
I will be able to sleep easy tonight now.
Question Author
Baldric

So pleased to be of assistance, I bet the likes of you haven't been able to get a good night's sleep since President Trump was inaugurated.
Ugh, that ugly phrase "The likes of you" crops up again.

POTUS , is doing a much better job than a lot of Folks gave him credit for,
And just what exactly does "the likes of you mean?"
The Time Cover was never meant to be real - it is obviously a PhotoShopped Cover.
The 3 year old never encounted Trump. And you would have to be really stupid to take it literally.
They are two juxta positioned images.
This child wasn’t separated, but very many are when a photographer isn’t about to capture the moment.
Another piece of top journalism by the magazine that likes to shock its readers by making people like Putin ‘person of the year’
Bad example but not fake news of course.
It’s nice to know Trump cages more humanely tho.
All news is biased in some fashion. And it is used a lot to discredit Trump.

It is a real shame they don’t but I do wish sometimes life would be so much sim0ler if the barefaced truth were told all the time.

But here’s the kicker. The same information can seem good from either side depending on what side you sit and what you believe and how you say it.

As per another thread... Trump hasn’t changed too much but had started to simply apply the law. Which is what some other presidents didn’t do. And because they want to vilify Trump only now bring up what has been happening with other presidents as well.
The kids are messing about on your computer again, Gromit.
You need to log off AB before you go out.

Still waiting on a response to 17:20 AOG
//The father of the tearful two-year-old Honduran migrant girl who became the face of the “family separation” news coverage says that his young daughter was never actually separated from her mother when caught by U.S. Border Patrol.
Instead, he says, his daughter and her mother are together in U.S. custody at “at a family residential center in Texas.”
Moreover, the mother had been deported from the U.S. in 2013, according to a statement given by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)//

Ohh dear, more lies by the libz. They appear to be even more desperate, over there, than our own to whip up outrage and false sympathy.

http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2018/06/21/fake-news-iconic-crying-migrant-girl-was-never-separated-from-mother-says-father/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_term=daily&;utm_content=links&utm_campaign=20180622

He didn’t apply an existing law. That is being rather economical with the truth. The scenes we witnessed were due to a directive in April which advocated ‘zero tolerance’ so while no laws were changed he effectively applied a new policy. It is certainly true that the law was applied under previous presidents. That is not at issue. Anyway, to his rather small credit he’s recanted, which was the right thing to do.
They just can't stop lying, Togo. I feel sorry for the simpletons that still listen to them.
-- answer removed --
If you believe this enconter actually hapoened, you are as stupid as Spicerack.

https://timedotcom.files.wordpress.com/2018/06/trump-immigration-final.jpg

It is not meant to be literal truth, and you would have to be terminally dumb to think it was. It is a photo monatage comparing two oppising stances.

Get to bed. Just you wait until your father sees what you've been up to.
Spicerack

Photoshopped. Obviously. No meeting of immigrant and Trump.
Just think for once. Everything you see is not literal truth, there is artistic licence. The Cover is a montage, an imagining, a ‘what if’. You are just too stupid to understand the device being deployed.
Your fault, not ours.
Question Author
Baldric

/// Still waiting on a response to 17:20 AOG ///

I apologise if you took offence over my post, it was just my immediate response to what I thought was just another sarcastic remark over my thread.
Question Author
Gromit

Can't you understand that no one is saying that the front cover of the Time magazine is a proper photo shoot?

This thread is all about the untruthful press reports of the crying 'left on her own' child.

Just like that other propaganda report of the Boy on the beach.

https://www.express.co.uk/comment/expresscomment/604590/Migrant-crisis-the-truth-about-the-boy-the-beach-Aylan-Kurdi
Gromit: "The Time Cover was never meant to be real - it is obviously a PhotoShopped Cover.
The 3 year old never encounted Trump. And you would have to be really stupid to take it literally.
They are two juxta positioned images.
This child wasn’t separated, but very many are when a photographer isn’t about to capture the moment. "
of course the cover was mocked up to illustrate how nasty trump was being, but the story inside claimed the child was forcefully removed from her mother it was not, hence the apology from Time. This is a typical fake news item by the left, for who trump can do no right. The border policy was inherited from Obama who no doubt inherited it himself.
// Everything you see is not literal truth//

Really? What like a message on a bus? Meehh.

1 to 20 of 25rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

So Just As We Thought It Was Fake News Once Again.

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.