SIGN UP

'news' What The Hell Are We Watching?

Avatar Image
Khandro | 23:34 Thu 12th Apr 2018 | News
26 Answers
All channels have been working all day on horror scenarios of total East/ West Armageddon and despite the facts that Trump is now wobbling, and the Syrian forces have now control of Ghouta, they continue, all based on completely uncorroborated mobile phone pics of children being splashed with water. Pathetic attempts by Sky News to conflate this imaginary to the chemical weapon attack with the Salisbury caper.

Sky anchor, Dermot Murnaghan dons an overcoat, scarf and gloves and pretends, against a filmed background, that he is in Red square, with nothing to say in relation to him being there, instead talks about events in London, in fact he goes "over to" the real Moscow corespondent who I think really is in Moscow but he doesn't seem to know where she is.



Answers

21 to 26 of 26rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Khandro. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Ha ha yes the current line is it was ‘fake gas’
Yesterday it was a real attack by ‘rebels’ . We’ve also had: ‘there was no attack at all’
The problem with all this is that one minute they say no one should jump to conclusions, and the next they do that themselves with bizarre and confident claims.
Someone who is counting these things claims they’ve come up with 25 different theories/accusations about Salisbury.
Liars, gangsters and criminals the lot of them. When Maria Zakharova claimed that naturally Russia would ‘defend its citizens’ in Syria against attack I nearly choked. This is the same government whose citizens have to be protected from their own govt’s ‘consular access’ in safe houses. One day the Russian people will be free of them, but it won’t be soon I fear
Lol we’ve already had that link from spicey.
Are the trolls running short of material ;-)
"Are the trolls running short of material ;-)"

or the jihadis running short of 'useful idiot(s)' ? ¦ ;¬ |

http://web.stanford.edu/group/mappingmilitants/cgi-bin/groups/view/369?highlight=Islamic+State#external
Aha. It's all making sense now.
Question Author
There is no filmed evidence by any reputable news gathering source that there has been a chemical weapons attack at all. All we have seen are very dodgy bits of videos from mobile phones of non-medical looking faceless young men spraying water on confused youngsters, without their parents with a complete absence of their parents. There is no identification of who filmed it or when or where, there is no evidence that this is nothing other than a complete fabrication which would not stand up as evidence in a court of law and you think it is sufficient intelligence to start WW3 ?


21 to 26 of 26rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Do you know the answer?

'news' What The Hell Are We Watching?

Answer Question >>