Donate SIGN UP

Corbyn, A Would-Be Leader Out Of Touch?

Avatar Image
Khandro | 08:56 Fri 03rd Nov 2017 | News
33 Answers
Doesn't this demonstrate that Labour have become the real nasty party?
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/874820/Jeremy-Corbyn-World-War-One-Remembrance-Day
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 33rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Khandro. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
There are many instances of Labour being the "Nasty Party".

But their followers are so blinkered they can't see it so, unlike the Tories whose supporters are not afraid to criticize the Party and move it forward, Labour go deeper and deeper.
He's a disgrace and not fit to lead conga!
He made those stupid, insensitive remarks in 2013.
Man is a twonk.
Think Corbyn would make a much better PRIME MINISTER than the very very weak one we have in charge at the moment, she just has no bottle .
An old hippy who never grew up - and never will. Peace man! God help us if he's ever in control of the country's security! Idiot!
Question Author
To the AB left, here's your man, and God help you!
Gulliver, he would not make a better Prime Minister than the one we have now.

It is patiently obvious to anyone with an ounce of common sense he would be a disaster. Economically, socially, defensively. Any ly you can think of we would be a dead duck in no time.

You seem to advocate getting rid of a 'bad' one with a worse one.
Another storm attempt in a teacup. He's entitled to think the cost of commemorating the centenary of WW1 wasn't justified if he wishes. I suspect he's in the minority but it's not like he's advocating genocide or something. Straw clutching, I reckon.
Obviously this post is to try and take the heat off Fallon, and the Troubled Con Party.{ Advise from Boris } Now is the time to throw a dead cat on the table.
When you are a leader of a Party OG sometimes you have to keep things to yourself. He represents the Party not himself.
He does both.
On a subject like this he (or any other leader) cannot do both.

It should be Party foremost as in this country that is what we vote for. Only JC's constituents vote for him.
This post is just to divert attention from Fallon and the Troubled Con party , Typical Tory Trick.
OG, money very clearly isn't Corbyn's main complaint.

//Mr Corbyn queried peoples’ motives to commemorate the war “other than the mass slaughter of millions of young men and women”.//
When you are a leader of a Party

perhaps you should check just when Corbyn became leader of the party, ymb?

Hint: it wasn't in 2013.
Gulliver, Don't be silly. Mr Fallon has his very own thread.
jno at 09:15, oh, well that's alright. Perhaps he's changed his mind since then .... but I doubt it.
that's okay then, naomi, if you don't know you can just make it up.
just shows the disdain in which Labour holds our forces past efforts. I suppose he and his ilk would rather have surrendered to the jackboot.
jno, Jeremy's nothing if not consistent - on his thoughts about war and peace at least.

1 to 20 of 33rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Corbyn, A Would-Be Leader Out Of Touch?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.