Donate SIGN UP
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 108rss feed

1 2 3 4 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by 1rovert. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
So now we have barristers telling the government how they must proceed.More sour grapes.
I didn't vote as I was so undecided but was probably leaning towards the stay campaign.

I think people should accept the vote but completely understand some voicing their dislike.
It's not sour grapes. It's people concerned about the future.
Let the shysters fight it out with the EU at their own expense. The EU have nailed their colours to the mast and want us out pronto.
This was labelled as a 'one off referendum in a lifetime'. Cameron and remainer May both said it will go ahead and must.
The backlash on the street would be unimaginable if the government reneged. It would be a tight squeeze to get 1,000 Barristers swinging from lamp posts down the Mall but manageable.
I never believed it to be legally binding .

Whether any government would go against the express will of those that voted to leave is another matter
No the referendum was never legally binding. It doesn't need 1000 barristers to point that out. It does need them probably to investigate the legal implications.
ummmm
It is sour grapes. As far as the referendum was concerned the result was decided. It is a done deed. Now the future has to be decided ,now that we have voted to leave, as to how we leave and with what.
Whether it is legally binding or not is not the point.Theresa May said ,when the result was announced, that , if elected, she would not go against the wishes of the people.
> "the wishes of the people"

The best reason not to proceed with Brexit would be if more than half the people in the country did not want it.

I'm surprised that those who want to reverse the decision don't follow that route.

A tedious election process, a vote denied to 16-17 year olds, floods in London and no doubt many other factors resulted in a 72% turnout and only about 17 million of a UK population of 65.1 million voting for Brexit - with less than 40% of the electorate voting for Brexit and only 2% of those that did vote voting one way rather than the other, resulting in the Brexit outcome.

There is a very real possibility that the majority of the country does not want Brexit and, if I was seeking to reverse the decision, that's the route I'd take.
they are probably worried their defences of foreign prisoners will be cutback
they're quite correct. Referendums are only advisory, parliament is sovereign; and yes, they do need to think carefully about how it's to be done, not just rely on the wild guesses and deliberate deceptions spouted during the campaign.
Ellipsis, moan all you want but the government has reiterated that there will not be another referendum.
It was one of the largest turn outs since the war. Tough ifthe lazy couldn't get off their backs to vote. We were all warned it was a 'once in a lifetime' referendum in plenty of time and I heard no objections to its legality before the UNEXPECTED leave vote won.
Now we have the losers crying foul like spoilt kids. Do the remainers all go running back to their newsagents if their lottery ticket doesn't win?
I am really getting sick of all this now. he 1001 reasons for another referendum, the 1001 reasons not to brexit, the reasons for the government not to invoke article 50, the 1000 un-named barristers trying to tell the government what to do etc. We had the referendum. The majority voted to leave. Get over it. May has announced today (for the second time) that BREXIT means BREXIT. There will be no second referendum and we are coming out of the EU. Get used to it!
another 1000 leeches telling as the bl33ding obvious, we know it's not legally binding it is morally binding, something these parasites wouldn't understand if they fell over it. Yes a thousand times yes, it was consultative but consulting and not acting would be the cause of a revolution. Now tell them to scoff another truck load of sour grapes and belt up.
Furthermore, and to me the most serious issue, is that of the 4 constituent parts of the UK only 2 voted to leave. That should at least give everyone pause for thought
What's new? We knew all along the referendum was only advisory , it was explained many times.
Danny, I'm not moaning, just getting on with it. We'd look like idiots if we went back on it now.

But it's dangerous of you (and May) to cite "the wishes of the people" when you don't know what the wishes of all of the people actually are. If somebody was to show that the majority of the people did not want Brexit, your own argument could be turned against you ...
so in the next election elipsis you'd be happy if all those that did not vote were in fact credited to the incumbent government then? right oh! think it through!
I really don't the government or indeed many thought the vote would be " out" hence, poor/ no preparation made.

1 to 20 of 108rss feed

1 2 3 4 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

What D'you Think Of This ?

Answer Question >>