Donate SIGN UP

Guardian an Mail Readers Agree! Shock Horror!

Avatar Image
rojash | 13:13 Thu 03rd May 2012 | News
16 Answers
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 16 of 16rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by rojash. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I've added my votes....
will this be before or after hes tried for war crimes
I sure some of the things he did bordered on treason.
Question Author
"will this be before or after hes tried for war crimes"
Well I sincerely hope it's neither. (That is to say, I hope he never goes back into politics under any circumstances).
/// Guardian an Mail Readers Agree! Shock Horror! ///

No shock horror about it whatsoever, why shouldn't the Mail and the Guardian readers agree on some issues?

No different than saying "Shock Horror" because they agree that murder should be treated as a crime?
I never thought I'd agree with anything Norman Tebbit said - but here, he is right on the button!

Blair has been cossetted by his money, his fawning acolytes, and his absence from the UK - I suggest his hubris on return would be considerable, and it is an example of his collossal ego that he even entertains the idea that british politics, or the British people, would be remotely interested in seeing him return.
King of Jordan is probably panicking right now. My guess he would be first target for invasion.

Odder things have happened in politics, just look at Mandy.
Would the Queen abdicate at the thought of having to meet Cherie again?
Question Author
No sense of humour again today then AOG?
For a politician who has never admitted mistakes I wonder wthether he was right to entertain Gaddafi and bring him in from the cold?
Hmm, two thirds anti-Blair on the vote - good.
no he was an arse then and that should stay firmly shut.
I think it is a great idea!
A great idea for what Quizm.. to have the Blairs shot, along with Gordon Brown for being such self-serving money grabbing barstewards they really are? They should be made to return all the money they made for themselves. while they sold the British Public down the river, opening the doors for the immigration problem, the national debt problem, the Iraq war and terrorism problem. And while they are at it take care of Wallace and Gromit and Gwindolene that run the Labour party at the moment.
Bring him on!

Wonderful!
Strangely enough, AskYG, I was answering the question! I thought that's what we were supposed to do.
Perhaps, just for me, you might care to comment on the multi-dollars Thatcher made twenty years ago from acting as an adviser to Philip Morris, the American tobacco giant. Can you see any moral difference between that and Blair's activities?

1 to 16 of 16rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Guardian an Mail Readers Agree! Shock Horror!

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.