Donate SIGN UP

Average Speed Cameras On M6

Avatar Image
Vagus | 17:33 Wed 19th Sep 2018 | Motoring
46 Answers
Drove up the M6 on Monday night through the road works. Set the cruise control to 53 mph and was overtaken by loads of hgvs.
Does anyone know why these lorries can just charge through the road works ignoring the 50mph average speed check or am I missing something?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 46rss feed

1 2 3 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Vagus. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
You're missing a fine - they're not but they won't realise that for a few weeks. Unlike the old type of camera, there is no flash so you don't know you've been caught until the fine arrives.
Thee's no escaping the average speed cameras.
Assuming they're switched on and they catch your number plate at both ends of the speed trap; if you're going over a certain speed - expect a fine through the letter box :)
Thee's = There's
its very unusual for an average speed camera to be set at 53 mph
^ It wasn't speed camera that was set at 53mph, it was the car's cruise control
yes, i got that. I was wondering why the op sped through the cameras then complains about others doing the same! It's ok for him but no for others
He was being overtaken by lots of people by the sound of it, which implies they were doing more than 53mph.
yes, but speeding is speeding you cant really do it yourself then moan about others doing it. If 53 is ok, what about 54, 55, 56, 57. 58 and so on
A rough rule of thumb for speed cameras is 10% + 2 mph; so this implies that travelling through a 50 mph speed limit at a speed of 56 mph or less (even though still speeding) should hopefully not trigger a ticket - although the safest way would be to travel AT the speed limit :)
Yes, enforcement of speed limits (by all methods) normally begins at (Limit + 10% + 2mph). This "allowance" stems from guidelines devised by the (now defunct) Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO). They were introduced to reduce the number of frivolous challenges that were being launched on the basis of inaccurate measurements. The rationale being that it harder to argue that the measurement is 5mph adrift (for a 30mph limit) than it is to argue that is 1mph out.

The buffer zone still exists although challenging speed measurements is nor far harder than it was when the ACPO guidelines were introduced. Today a court dealing with a speeding charge is entitled to assume that an type-approved device operated in the correct manner is accurate. If the defendant wants to challenge that assumption it falls to him to show that the device cannot be relied upon - not an easy task even with expert advice and virtually impossible without.
Ah, guilty until proven innocent eh.
To answer the presumption that the OP is speeding because his cruise control is set at 53mph - that’s a load of horse feathers.

My (not very old) Mazda had a speedo that was so inaccurate that an indicated 55mph was just under 50mph when properly measured - I know that for certain, because I used a GPS deviceto check it. So if I set my cruise to 53mph then I’d be well inside the limit - it may well be that the OP has checked his own car speedo in a similar way - and they ALL under read by a few per cent. Even my current bit of Vorsprung Dutch Technik reads 51.5mph for an accurate 50mph.
“Durch” not Hollandische
"Ah, guilty until proven innocent eh."

Not at all, OG. It would be unreasonable to expect the prosecution to prove that a measurement device is accurate every time a speeding prosecution reaches court. Speed cameras and other equipment is "type approved" before use. Stringent tests are carried out on its accuracy. In the same way new cars are "type approved" to ensure they comply with the various construction & use regulations. Once type approval is granted the owner does not have to prove that things such as the lights, exhaust emissions, number plates and so on comply with those regulations if he is stopped.
There is no allowance by Northumbria Police regarding speed,I got done doing 32mph in a 30mph zone. £60 fine and 3 points.
The guidance about not charging unless the speed is 10% plus 2mph above the limit is exactly that, guidance.

Police can enforce the limits and anyone driving outwith the limits can be fined or get points.
Non-compliant lights aren't going be used to accuse another of wrong-doing. It's fair enough not to have to prove their validity. But the readings from a measurement device will be the basis of an accusation and thus it is reasonable to have to prove it's accuracy. Different situation.
"The guidance about not charging unless the speed is 10% plus 2mph above the limit is exactly that, guidance.

Police can enforce the limits and anyone driving outwith the limits can be fined or get points."

Indeed, and I did open my post with "Yes, enforcement of speed limits (by all methods) normally begins at (Limit + 10% + 2mph)."

However, apart from denton, above, I have only encountered one person who I know had enforcement action taken at below the guideline levels and he, shall we be polite and say "failed the attitude test" when he was stopped by a mobile patrol.

"...and thus it is reasonable to have to prove it's accuracy."

Its accuracy has been proved by its type approval, OG. Do you ask your electricity supplier to prove your electric meter's accuracy every time they send you your bill?
Years ago leeway was given in the Met as 10%. When our pursuit
vehicles stopped a motorist the police motorcycle or car had to be tested by a police garage hand within 24 hours on a rolling road in the Traffic Garage. Fleet No of vehicle and dates of testing and the offence were put in a log so,if contested, the police garage hand would trot along to court as a professional witness.Most older vehicles of the day had cable operated speedos from a gearbox attached to a hub on the drive wheels of the offenders vehicle.As accuracy of these speedos could not be ascertained the 10% rule was established. As tech progressed the electric pulse activated speedos were considered much more accurate and many forces,Thames Valley and Hants to name a couple take no prisoners if you are 1mph over. :-( The speedo on my skoda superb is accurate and shows the same speed reading on the cars fitted Sat Nav and also the Tom Tom I sometimes use
NJ
"Do you ask your electricity supplier to prove your electric meter's accuracy every time they send you your bill?"

A couple of times my wife and I have been challenged in foreign airports by ground stewardesses at baggage check-in and asked for a hefty penalty for a kilo or two allegedly over.
When I have agreed that if my luggage allowance has been exceeded then we will pay the penalty providing they produce the latest calibration certificates for the scales. Suddenly "no speaka the English" is muttered and we get waved through. A racket.

1 to 20 of 46rss feed

1 2 3 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Average Speed Cameras On M6

Answer Question >>