Donate SIGN UP

Mastermind champion of champions

Avatar Image
osprey | 11:01 Fri 06th Aug 2010 | TV
4 Answers
I don't wish to appear pedantic, but whoever wins can't REALLY be the CofC as not all those who won have taken part - or were there eliminations that we are unaware of? I cannot believe that winners such as Kevin Ashman and Fred Housego to name only 2 didn't want to take part, especially as 2 other Eggheads - Chirs Hughes and Pat Gibson - have both taken part. Looking forward to tonights' final.
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 4 of 4rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by osprey. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Isn't that a bit like saying the winners of the world cup aren't really the winners as they haven't played all the teams?
Question Author
Count-a-strong - Not at all. How can someone be a champion of champions when not all the available champions have been given the oppurtunity to compete? It has nothing at all to do with one person having to play all the others. In your example, all the teams have at least been given the chance to take part; whether the eventual winner plays the others is irrelevant.
Pedantic here we go:
All people taking part were champions, admittedly not all of them.
The winner of a competition with only champions taking part is a Chapion of Champions.
Question Author
I don't wish to labout the point, but does antone know if ALL the available Champions were given the oppurtunity to take part? I have emailed the BBC but they are ignoring my request. Nothing new there as they do that with everyone - so much for a company that is owned by the people!!

1 to 4 of 4rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Mastermind champion of champions

Answer Question >>