Donate SIGN UP

Strictly Stupid

Avatar Image
vernonk | 07:36 Mon 07th Nov 2016 | Film, Media & TV
10 Answers
See this from today's Mail: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3911248/Strictly-Come-Dancing-fans-cry-foul-Twitter-blundering-Ed-Balls-continues-survive-skilled-stars.html
Some viewers demanding Ed Balls quit, and others saying he is what Strictly is all about. For me, almost pro dancer Danny Mac (let alone experienced dancer Louise and possibly Ore though he denies it) is not what Strictly is about as he started great and will end great. Ed Balls however is on "a journey", yet his dancing will never compare to Mac's. Fault lies with people choosing the celebs for the show. Make them all non-dancers, I say
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 10 of 10rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by vernonk. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
It still does really well in the ratings so maybe it has got the balance right- plenty of great dancers, an underdog (Ed Balls) who is making a real effort and is doing far better than underdogs from previous years, and plenty of eye candy for both sexes.
Have to agree with you vernonk. They should all start out on a level playing field but of course it won't because it's down to a personality driven show. IMO it's unfair to the contestants who are complete novices when competing against those who already have had training in dancing or are from that sort of entertainment background. As for those suggesting Ed Balls quits because he's not 'as good' as some of the others...damned nonsense, a public vote takes place and the result should be stuck with. Some people just don't accept a fair decision do they!
Question Author
Agreed Dunnital. Strange parallel with the Brexit referendum here....
Some people seem to lose track of the fact that it is purely an entertainment show. It is not a professional dance competition but as FF says a good floorshow.
Yes vernonk....that's what I was thinking re the Brexit vote...
The show's remit is entirely entertainment.

The problem with giving the public a vote - and the parallel is Ali G over on X-Factor - is that the public is prone to be wilfully mischievous with its voting powers, which increases the profile of the shows, and vexes anyone with anything approaching a moral sense of fair play.

I think the job of choosing a selection of people who are not only nominally famous, but also have no dance skills would be pretty tricky, not to say unentertaining.

One Ed Balls, the same as one Ali G per serious makes for controversy - a bunch of them would make for boring television, which defeats the main remit of either snow.
Do you want him to do a, "John Sergeant " vernonk?
If this was a genuine audition show, and the winner was going to go on to a professional career as a dancer, then the blockage that is Ed Balls would be an issue.

But since all 'celebrities' will return to their respective day jobs, it doesn't matter at all who wins.
Question Author
chrissa1, absolutely not. I'd like Strictly to only have celebs who've not previously had dance training. I've no interest in the likes of Danny and Louise. It's an ego trip for them, not a journey
Isn't this rather over-analysing light entertainment?

1 to 10 of 10rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Strictly Stupid

Answer Question >>