Donate SIGN UP

claim

Avatar Image
Connemmara | 12:58 Sun 07th Feb 2010 | Law
13 Answers
How much would one receive in compensation for the loss of half your leg - below the knee.
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 13 of 13rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Connemmara. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
Question Author
sorry - a bus crashed into him waiting at the bus stop
-- answer removed --
Question Author
Zacsmaster I would know all that but I am only after a brief rough guess would it be £300,000
-- answer removed --
Question Author
the bus company was very negligent as the bus mounted the pavement
-- answer removed --
The purpose of the compensation is to provide money to pay for things like loss of earnings over a period of time - if the individual now can't do what they did before - plus an element of what I suppose could be called 'inconvenience factor'.
The gross award then gets chopped back if the individual was partly liable for the accident.
Hence it is impossible to provide a figure.
A 28 year old professional footballer will get a lot more than a 70 year old person who has needed a mobility scooter to get around.
Basic compensation for injuries is based on the JSB Guidelines, previous caselaw and often the legal text Kemp & Kemp (Not Martin and Ross BTW).

JSB states that the compensation reward for amputation of one leg is £50,000 - £155,000, depending on where the amputation has taken place i.e. above / below knee. Any other damages would depend on future loss of earnings (i.e. a solicitor would get much more than a bin man) and other circumstances such as loss of promotion, disadvantage in the workplace etc.
Question Author
he lost below the knee and only worked 5 hours per week.
Question Author
for zacsmaster - driver lost control - after this particular accident - another little girl was killed again by a negligent bus driver so there
If he worked 5 hours a week, he wouldn't earn £300,000 and so your figure is unrealistic. It will be much lower and based around his income.

1 to 13 of 13rss feed

Do you know the answer?

claim

Answer Question >>