Donate SIGN UP

Answers

21 to 23 of 23rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by mikey4444. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I have no direct experience of the London areas he refers to but it seems to me usage can change over years. Does for buildings, why wouldn't traffic routes convert to pedestrian use ? That said I suspect most times it is done it is done to be seen to be supporting pedestrians and the illusions of green credentials without given proper thought to the pain it brings them when they drive instead. If some areas are deemed to have been an error there's no reason not to correct that. But the cost of the error ought to be placed on the person who pushed the scheme through with insufficient thought, not the poor taxpayer yet again.
Roads in London, especially around the city and the West End, are generally quite narrow and very cramped. I'm not sure how those areas could realistically be pedestrianised. There's nowhere else for the traffic to go.
Exactly, Naomi.

Most of central London's streets are decades, if not hundreds of years old and it was never envisaged that swathes of the city would become off limits to vehicles. There are plenty of places that have been designed from the outset at pedestrian zones.

21 to 23 of 23rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Do you know the answer?

Boris Is Finally Gone Mad !

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.