History4 mins ago
She Was Vilified, Will This 680K Go Some Way To Compensate Her?
8 Answers
Answers
1 to 8 of 8
Her vilification
23:00 Wed 23rd Jul 2014
Terrible damage to Ms Shoesmith's reputation.
And reassuring to see that her reputation is worth at least ten times as much as an accident victim's legs.
http://
(turns off sarcasm alarm)
Te claim that she would never work again is somewhat inconsistent with the claim for compensation.
She is only entitled to compensation if she is found to be not at fault.
And, if she is found to be not at fault, why should she never work again?
Still, hey ho, give her a huge award and let the tax payers take that one on the chin.
Nice to have such a well pai, and well compensated, job with so little apparent responsibility.
And reassuring to see that her reputation is worth at least ten times as much as an accident victim's legs.
http://
(turns off sarcasm alarm)
Te claim that she would never work again is somewhat inconsistent with the claim for compensation.
She is only entitled to compensation if she is found to be not at fault.
And, if she is found to be not at fault, why should she never work again?
Still, hey ho, give her a huge award and let the tax payers take that one on the chin.
Nice to have such a well pai, and well compensated, job with so little apparent responsibility.
Her vilification, and her Unfair Dismissal case are mutually exclusive.
The fact that Ms Shoosmith was incompetent, and her department oversaw the needless death of this poor child did not justify the knee-jerk reaction of a Minister who went with his emotions instead of his remit, and the law.
It simply adds to the whole sorry business that a Minister was able to drive a coach and four through standard employment law because he was blinkered by his eagerness to register is outrage, and be seen as taking popular action.
The one is an incompetent fool ... oh, and actually, so is the other one!
The fact that Ms Shoosmith was incompetent, and her department oversaw the needless death of this poor child did not justify the knee-jerk reaction of a Minister who went with his emotions instead of his remit, and the law.
It simply adds to the whole sorry business that a Minister was able to drive a coach and four through standard employment law because he was blinkered by his eagerness to register is outrage, and be seen as taking popular action.
The one is an incompetent fool ... oh, and actually, so is the other one!
1 to 8 of 8
Latest Posts
Enigmatic Variations N0 1639 By...
Crosswords10 mins ago
Crosswords15 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles34 mins ago
Connections 317 - Tuesday 23 April
Quizzes & Puzzles126 mins ago
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.