Quizzes & Puzzles0 min ago
Striking Teachers
Parents are fined if they take their kids out of school for holidays in term-time, yet teachers can strike when they feel like it without fear of repercussions.
Parents are inconvenienced enough times having to arrange extra childcare for the countless 'teacher training/inset' days during the school year
Parents get fined for taking kids out of school, yet no penalties for teachers when they strike and don't turn up at school at the first sign of snow
Parents are inconvenienced enough times having to arrange extra childcare for the countless 'teacher training/inset' days during the school year
Parents get fined for taking kids out of school, yet no penalties for teachers when they strike and don't turn up at school at the first sign of snow
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by joeluke. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Yes ..but five year olds become six ,then seven and before you know it they are sixteen .Education goes on .
You would certainly need a degree to teach some subjects .
Which is basically what some teachers are trying to say . Why should they have to study at university to gain a degree enabling them to teach when Gove says it's Ok to have unqualified people .
You would certainly need a degree to teach some subjects .
Which is basically what some teachers are trying to say . Why should they have to study at university to gain a degree enabling them to teach when Gove says it's Ok to have unqualified people .
Everyone has a right to withdraw labour. It is the only way the masses have achieved a fairer deal and ensure those in a position to use them to create wealth do not go too far and abuse their workers.
Complaining because of inconvenience is inappropriate, especially since there are two sides to any dispute and it is unreasonable to push all the blame for a strike on those who felt they were left little option. It smacks of, "I'm important, should not have inconveniences in life, the rest of you are not and should put up with whatever state you find yourself".
If one wished not to lump a number of complaints together as if it made a case and discussed each separately, then there may be something worth investigating.
Complaining because of inconvenience is inappropriate, especially since there are two sides to any dispute and it is unreasonable to push all the blame for a strike on those who felt they were left little option. It smacks of, "I'm important, should not have inconveniences in life, the rest of you are not and should put up with whatever state you find yourself".
If one wished not to lump a number of complaints together as if it made a case and discussed each separately, then there may be something worth investigating.
Have you got a link to that, ummmm?
We were refused permission.
http://
We were refused permission.
http://
A party has a manifesto and the electorate has the option to vote upon that manifesto. If elected, that party then has the mandate to introduce the legislation proposed in that manifesto at any point following that election whether that is immediately or three years later. The same principal applies to industrial action.
I thought that industrial action had to start within 28 days of a legal ballot, that it can go to 8 weeks with the permission of the employer and that you don`t necessarily have legal protection (against being sacked) if it continues beyond 12 weeks. How did they get away with 2 years? Not to mention people who have voted and then ended their employment in which case their votes would be illegal?
