Donate SIGN UP
Gravatar

Answers

21 to 36 of 36rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by -Talbot-. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Is Germany just looking for a new way of European domination?
I would have thought if you were going to quote Yeats in relation to the AFD in the German elections this would have been more apt ( from the same work no less).
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
"More apt"?

Depending on what future Yeats was contemplating/warning against.

I like "passionate intensity".

So descriptive of the artistic and sentimental claaa.

Try "class", VE.
To get back to your original question Talbot I suspect the answer is No, Merkle will not listen.

As usual it is the liberal left the are fuelling the rise of the far left/right, will they ever learn?
Khandro, thanks for the link.

Mickey clearly needs to read it judging from his post. Doubt that will happen either as it might ruin his warped view!
mikey4444
/// Just to make it clear what the AFD stands for ::

They are climate change deniers.

They want Germany to do a "180 degree" turn regarding the countries role in WW2.

They want to bring back conscription.

They are against same-sex marriage ///

Did any one else notice that mikey conveniently left out their most urgent aim,

They are predominately against 'MASS IMMIGRATION'.


Germany, the new thread.
AOG, does the fact that the AfD want to stop mass immigration make all the other items which Mikey listed OK?
//AOG, does the fact that the AfD want to stop mass immigration make all the other items which Mikey listed OK?//

The two things are not correlated. Which is, I think, the point the poster was trying to make. You can share an opinion of mass immigration while disagreeing about climate change or same-sex marriage nonsense
.
They're correlated insofar as the party's overall political aims. I was merely asking whether........

well, its pretty obvious what i was asking.
Yes, I suppose there's a problem with all single-issue groups like AfD and UKIP. To get representation you've got to create a political agenda. Manifestos and all that stuff. My guess is that AfD would split on conventional lines on all other issues (economic policy etc). I voted UKIP whenever I could, but didn't know (and cared less) what their stance was on any issue apart fro EU membership.
It's a dangerous gambit to vote for a party who have extremist views just because you like one element of their manifesto.
What's extreme about either of the partied, I wonder?
If opposition to same-sex marriage is "extreme", for example, then why would you invite a million people who are also opposed to same-sex marriage into your country? Is that or is that not a self-contradictory stance?
'They want Germany to do a "180 degree" turn regarding the countries role in WW2.'

pretty extreme IMO.

I'm afraid i don't follow your same sex marriage argument as you seem to have assumed that that's my stance. When it most definitely isn't.

21 to 36 of 36rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Do you know the answer?

Germany, The New Beginning.

Answer Question >>